ihtfp07

3 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by ihtfp07 8y ago

   well glad we agree on content and just have a different interpretation of what his article is implying! Instead of discussing the article, let’s just look at other commenters and see their interpretation. reviewing other comments in this t
2. 2.▲
   by ihtfp07 8y ago

   I can acknowledge that in retrospect she could have acted differently and avoided this whole situation... But she was mainly the victim. The over reaction by the initial reporter and the authories above them seem a bit wrong but not egregio
3. 3.▲
   by ihtfp07 8y ago

   Totally agree! It really seems like the article is trying to say she was invited to attend her first burning man by this creepy interviewer and that she attended it mainly for networking purposes but brought her mom and a “conservative” att
4. 4.▲
   by ihtfp07 8y ago

   See my other comment...Star probably was attending burning man before this guy was. She knew more about it than him. Also if you were into burning man since 2006, the event then was less about “bacchanalia” and “free love”. This was before
5. 5.▲
   by ihtfp07 8y ago

   As usual the media gets this a bit wrong and is obscuring the truth. Star knew more about Burning Man than this harassing interviewer. I was a couple years ahead of Star in school and know she was a long time fan of burning man, even going