well glad we agree on content and just have a different interpretation of what his article is implying! Instead of discussing the article, let’s just look at o

well glad we agree on content and just have a different interpretation of what his article is implying! Instead of discussing the article, let’s just look at other commenters and see their interpretation. reviewing other comments in this thread I see: - commenters that believe she made plans to go to burning man on a weeks notice and convinced her mom to join. And got tickets. - commenters that re-interpret “conservative” to mean professional/business casual attire. That interpretation makes Simpson seems particularly oblivious about the event which is clearly untrue - a commenter that specifically mentions her naivete As I’ve said already, what these commenters think isn’t true, but they believe these things because that’s what the article unfairly implies. I’m glad this article is drawing attention to this harasser and this issue in general, but it does a disservice to the victim to falsely paint them in this light.