iab

51 ms·

631.
by iab 6y ago
Thanks for your response. Didn’t know about that functionality on either platform, will check it out.
632.
by iab 6y ago
5.99 to activate - interesting. Reminds me of: https://www.iata.org/en/pressroom/pr/2020-11-23-01/ - a digital travel pass. Soon we will be assigned a phone at birth I suppose. How would you stop the off
633.
by iab 6y ago
Emotionally I agree with you, because I hate cardio. But I feel like there is some merit to sustained heart rate for (e.g) some improved aspects of brain function.
634.
by iab 6y ago
Did you go refurbished or new?
635.
by iab 6y ago
That is impressive. Suggestions for the eye balm?
636.
by iab 6y ago
But how does it interface with Bitcoin
637.
by iab 6y ago
You used to get asked - what’s your T? Where is your deep expertise, and your breadth. This does (to first order approx) not exist in the valley, most often with successful executives & VCs. “Why don’t you just...” - no acknowledgement
638.
by iab 6y ago
“My gentle lady of the tortugas” - just rolls off the tongue
639.
by iab 6y ago
LOVE this map style. Thinking about moving down to Namibia.
640.
by iab 6y ago
At-home fitness workouts with (limited) equipment; running, cycling.
641.
by iab 6y ago
A thoughtful article. It is becoming increasingly obvious that the integration of field/home robotics into our daily lives is going to require us to adapt to the technology, more so than it adapts to us. For example, a (new) house con
642.
by iab 6y ago
Well, you definitely seemed to get the technology-market-fit right.
643.
by iab 6y ago
Spoiler tag, jeez :)
644.
by iab 6y ago
Seems related to https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=25247200 , but as opposed to being “stupid light” is “stupid heavy”
645.
by iab 6y ago
A nice approach. Progress is often a product of error correction, which is great for unfeeling entities like sprint boards and repositories, not as great for people.
646.
by iab 6y ago
This is a good point, and a difficult one to get right. Being able to very easily fetch and integrate dependencies (e.g npm) definitely lowers the barrier, for better and worse. Single-file collections ( e.g https://github.com&#x
647.
by iab 6y ago
This article would seem to generate “more heat than light”
648.
by iab 6y ago
Is this in response to https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=25238453 ? Would love to know why Buck vs Bazel/plz.
649.
by iab 6y ago
Great stuff, thanks for this great addition to the build ecosystem
650.
by iab 6y ago
Would you consider it for other mono-repo language projects?
651.
by iab 6y ago
If you have used (e.g) bazel before, I strongly encourage you to give it a bash, very easy to pickup and “feels good” to use
652.
by iab 6y ago
I can see your point, pretty aggravating. Is WSL an option?
653.
by iab 6y ago
Speaking from my own limited experience, plz works really well for compiled languages, and total-build approaches (everything from source). I am not sure how much of a multiplier it is for python, apart from finer-grained dependency control
654.
by iab 6y ago
For the first part of your question - it is not 1:1. There is some limited capacity for bazel integration, but massaging is needed (IME) for protos, nvcc rules & so on
655.
by iab 6y ago
Agreed - pretty seamless chain from build to execution
656.
by iab 6y ago
Plz is great for c++, and has a better workflow (IMO) vs (e.g) Cmake. The skylark-like syntax is easier to reason through than cmake generative expressions. Also the use of “plz run” vs “cmake -g; make; run”
657.
by iab 6y ago
Yes indeed, the humor in my comment didn't land. The device coupling is out of hand, like when your phone rings and the watch, computer, fridge an vacuum also buzz.
658.
by iab 6y ago
Wait, are you saying you don’t want this??
659.
by iab 6y ago
The linked data url doesn’t redirect to anything
660.
by iab 6y ago
It would be great if this program could be a counterweight to the B-2 and F-35 debacles, but I still feel skeptical

More ›