i_no_can_eat

5 ms·

1.
by i_no_can_eat 24d ago
Can you elaborate on what constitutes a vacuous proof?
2.
by i_no_can_eat 1mo ago
> I'm terrible at grammer Also pretty bad at spelling.
3.
by i_no_can_eat 1mo ago
What a lovely country.
4.
by i_no_can_eat 1mo ago
> Southern europeans tip No we don't. In Portugal, Spain, and Italy it's not common nor expected.
5.
A gas-enshrouded and gas-reddened black hole at cosmic dawn(nature.com)
1 points by i_no_can_eat 2mo ago|0 comments
6.
by i_no_can_eat 2mo ago
My comment was specifically about those alternative "dark stars" hypothesis. Is there one with a formation scenario?
7.
by i_no_can_eat 2mo ago
The difference is that we have theorerically sound formation scenarious for black holes under very broad conditions, and we have absolutely no model for a formation scenario of such an exotic dark star.
8.
Why do we do astrophysics?(arxiv.org)
3 points by i_no_can_eat 2mo ago|0 comments
9.
by i_no_can_eat 1y ago
The sea was angry that day, my friends
10.
Quantum Computing's Hard, Cold Reality Check(spectrum.ieee.org)
2 points by i_no_can_eat 3y ago|0 comments
11.
Meta gave up on GPU and CPU to take a RISC-y route for AI(techradar.com)
3 points by i_no_can_eat 3y ago|0 comments
12.
"blue" and "green" appeared in a language – EurekAlert(eurekalert.org)
3 points by i_no_can_eat 3y ago|2 comments
13.
How the Most Useless Branch of Math Could Save Your Life(youtube.com)
4 points by i_no_can_eat 3y ago|0 comments
14.
Elon Musk admits X may fail after image glitch(fortune.com)
3 points by i_no_can_eat 3y ago|2 comments
15.
by i_no_can_eat 3y ago
> If they have paid to register for your conference, it’s your duty to write those letters. I should probably have made it clear that I'm talking about conferences without registration fees.
16.
by i_no_can_eat 3y ago
Very interesting to know, thanks. Let me then ask: if getting a tourist visa is simpler, is there any problem in asking for a tourist visa even if your intention is attending a conference?
17.
by i_no_can_eat 3y ago
> Painting an entire country as large and diverse as India with just one brush dipped in personal anecdotes is just flawed and biased thinking. I don't think that my comment did that. I'm precisely acknowledging that such bias
18.
by i_no_can_eat 3y ago
There is another side to this. Whenever I have organized conferences, I end up receiving lots of requests for invitation letters, typically from researchers in India, for Visa purposes. I absolutely understand this, and I have always done m
19.
Marxism: The Idea That Refuses to Die – Areo(areomagazine.com)
5 points by i_no_can_eat 3y ago|5 comments
20.
by i_no_can_eat 3y ago
There is no misconception. The only class of theories that I'm aware of that have MOND as their non-relativistic limit are TeVeS, and these have been ruled out by experiments. If you have something else in mind, please provide a paper
21.
by i_no_can_eat 3y ago
^ This is just a load of rubbish. It makes absolutely no sense. Thanks for proving my point.
22.
by i_no_can_eat 3y ago
You started this discussion saying "LIGO, VIRGO, and NANOGrav experiments and observations proved that speed of light in vacuum is NOT constant". This is completely absurd, as anyone who works in the field will tell you. I never s
23.
by i_no_can_eat 3y ago
The problem in this discussion is that you don't have an understanding of the concepts involved. You haven't properly understood the LIGO experiments and you clearly know nothing of general relativity. There really is no point in
24.
by i_no_can_eat 3y ago
The LIGO/VIRGO experiments proved no such thing. You seem to have a fundamentally flawed understanding of these experiments. That the speed of light is constant in vacuum is one of the fundamental assumptions of general relativity. The
25.
by i_no_can_eat 3y ago
> For example: Michelson-Morley experiment — disproved by LIGO/VIRGO and NANOGrav. Care to elaborate?
26.
by i_no_can_eat 3y ago
TeVeS theories have many problems. Among others, they have been ruled out by observational data [1,2]. [1] https://journals.aps.org/prx/pdf/10.1103/PhysRevX.11.041050 [2] https://arxiv.org/abs
27.
by i_no_can_eat 3y ago
I never mentioned dark matter. My only point is that any modern gravitational theory needs to do at least as well as general relativity. That means (among others): explaining the precession or Mercury; describe black holes; predict gravitat
28.
by i_no_can_eat 3y ago
Fluid dynamics is not a fundamental theory, but an effective model, as you said. The point here is that MOND can't explain something that GR has been able to explain for 100 years (precession of Mercury). So any serious gravitational t
29.
by i_no_can_eat 3y ago
Exactly. And the well-posed gravitational theory that has MOND as a limit has not yet been found. So why is MOND considered as anything but an effective model?
30.
by i_no_can_eat 3y ago
Can you explain the precession of Mercury with MOND?

More ›