Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
i5Aj7PXGjUPy
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
5 ms
·
1.
▲
by
i5Aj7PXGjUPy
4y ago
Historically no, unless you think only allowing landowners a vote is democracy
2.
▲
by
i5Aj7PXGjUPy
4y ago
> Moderates generally lack any firm convictions or anchoring principles beyond maintaining equanimity, and so contribute mightily to shifting of overton windows and ethical drift, where increasingly flawed outcomes are excused in the nam
3.
▲
by
i5Aj7PXGjUPy
4y ago
> but the court is also pro-gerrymandering See the redistricting of North Carolina > so the unpopularity is unlikely to have any real impact on elections Or maybe it isn't as unpopular as you think? > The country is rapidly hu
4.
▲
by
i5Aj7PXGjUPy
4y ago
> So we end up in a situation where a healthy majority of the country wants some level of abortion rights some level of abortion rights != Roe and the extent of Roe I'd imagine an easy majority supports it in cases of threats to the
5.
▲
by
i5Aj7PXGjUPy
4y ago
> I don't think that's the argument the earlier post is making. They are arguing that you cannot be compelled to do something to save some else's life even if it won't harm you, and doubly so without due process. Choo
6.
▲
by
i5Aj7PXGjUPy
4y ago
> CNN reported the number has never been above 36% for “should roe v wade be overturned” the poll said "completely overturned", which is the more radical position. roe v wade being completely overturned is not the same as "
7.
▲
by
i5Aj7PXGjUPy
4y ago
> At this point I see it as a fight between rich landowners+business owners+religion vs all the rest of the people Based off of the responses itt, it's clearly not "all the rest of the people". But you know, maybe if you k
8.
▲
by
i5Aj7PXGjUPy
4y ago
> The equal protection clause extends that right to your own body to women No it doesn't Here's the clause: "All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of th
9.
▲
by
i5Aj7PXGjUPy
4y ago
idk why you're getting downvoted. This was literally a compromise made by the founders to protect smaller states from larger states
10.
▲
by
i5Aj7PXGjUPy
4y ago
> Where you see delegating to the states, I see a minority (less than 30% of Americans agree with this) Provide the source and the question that was asked on it. The majority of Americans think it should be up to the states, whether the
11.
▲
by
i5Aj7PXGjUPy
4y ago
I think 4.4BSD on MacOS
12.
▲
by
i5Aj7PXGjUPy
4y ago
why are suits so afraid of code that they fall for the no-code spiel?
13.
▲
by
i5Aj7PXGjUPy
4y ago
> but I will say that firefox loads a lot faster than chromium on my machine. which machine??? genuinely curious
14.
▲
by
i5Aj7PXGjUPy
4y ago
> “many in the Chromium community are arguing for a Chromium-only Web.” This is why I'll use firefox until it's gone. Considering the push for mv3, I'd rather have a functioning ad blocker that actually blocks ads instead
15.
▲
by
i5Aj7PXGjUPy
4y ago
> The chromium-only web is not google’s fault. It is a symptom of a body of web standards that has grown wild to the point of being all but unimplementable. what exactly is the benefit of having a byzantine set of standards in the first