Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
hypfer
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
8 ms
·
181.
▲
by
hypfer
1mo ago
GitHub flavored FOSS I believe works best for "corporate FOSS" projects and terrible for "FOSS as how it was conceived decades ago". Or rather I believe that it is engineered exactly for the former. What it does well is
182.
▲
by
hypfer
1mo ago
> This isn't zero sum. True, it is actually negative sum, because fake merit erodes trust in real merit, as it makes it a lot harder to spot the latter.
183.
▲
by
hypfer
1mo ago
The whole idea of "counting PRs" as a vanity metric is flawed because vanity metrics are flawed. I don't think that there is a technical solution to be found here, as the problem is anything but technical. __ A hack/trap
184.
▲
by
hypfer
1mo ago
> For example nearly all social rules that are commonly accepted in society are basically about which kinds of manipulations and bullying of other people are accepted by most people vs not. Can you elaborate on that?
185.
▲
by
hypfer
1mo ago
5-20 years? Have you seen the financials of the AI companies?
186.
▲
by
hypfer
1mo ago
Where does the compute happen? I suppose it's a cloud thing?
187.
▲
by
hypfer
1mo ago
It is my belief that a prerequisite to a counter-argument is an argument.
188.
▲
by
hypfer
1mo ago
The quality of discussion here is not up to the standards I would want it to be. What are you even saying there. "Humans are also not perfect, so anything is possible" but painted with a coat of fake intellectualism. What a waste
189.
▲
by
hypfer
1mo ago
> Reading this really makes me wish that I had a slightly better workflow. I'm really soley dependent of Fable Good thing then that you're fully in control of your own actions. A gift granted to us by being a fully grown adult
190.
▲
by
hypfer
1mo ago
> But the reliability problem is being fixed quickly, as researchers create models that can check their own work and improve themselves. Soon they will be substantially better than humans at many tasks. Yes, no. They don't. They jus
191.
▲
by
hypfer
1mo ago
Only as long as you still have enough cash to order uber eats.
192.
▲
by
hypfer
1mo ago
I'm really not sure why people are cheering for this. We've been rightfully pissed at companies doing unethical things and getting away with it, as there is simply nothing you can hurt them with. Why is HN fantasizing about making
193.
▲
by
hypfer
1mo ago
> Power is what makes them what they are, not knowledge or skills or empathy. No. Oh my god no. This is just engineers coping with the reality that they've been filtered by skillchecks of a system they do not (yet) understand. But i
194.
▲
by
hypfer
1mo ago
Yes
195.
▲
by
hypfer
1mo ago
If people would unironically start pushing for this, I genuinely do not know what to do. I guess that would be at least a nice bang to let democracy finally die. Let's hope that we never see that happening. ___ To expand on that: I bel
196.
▲
by
hypfer
1mo ago
I dislike performative business people as much as the next guy, but you can't tell me that you people really think that this is anything other than a petty and equally performative PR stunt. Revenge of the nerds.
197.
▲
by
hypfer
1mo ago
There is no shortage of articles on the HN front page, stating that being "just a code monkey" is likely going to have much less employment options soon-ish. A likely correct but also at this point rather stale observation.
198.
▲
by
hypfer
1mo ago
> I think when push comes to shove we either need to shut down the networks/internet or risk AI locking us out of everything potentially for ransom. Yes, I too believe that this is what is going to happen. The ban of foreign robotic
199.
▲
by
hypfer
1mo ago
You can fit Shrek 1 into a 13mb gif tho https://www.deviantart.com/sssfjknfvdknj/art/the-ENTIRE-shre...
200.
▲
by
hypfer
1mo ago
What do you do with all those tokens?
201.
▲
by
hypfer
1mo ago
The problem with those two picked examples is that their nature displays a lack of basic care and due diligence. Of course, this is a culture war, but the point the blog post is making is that the Omarchy side is not exactly at the forefron
202.
▲
by
hypfer
1mo ago
> have no chance at end user penetration and loyalty until there's a single focused survivor. But why does that matter? End users (I believe, feel free to correct) do not really contribute all that much revenue-wise. They're ce
203.
▲
by
hypfer
1mo ago
FWIW, the way GLM-5.2 (and 5.3) talk is clearly claude, so it is for sure also trained using distillation. The metric used there is me screaming at my screen per operating hours. Does it matter? IMO not really. Weights are open after all. (
204.
▲
by
hypfer
1mo ago
> The company on Wednesday confirmed speculation that the Ox Alpha model is a new iteration of its GLM series and said it will release the weights for it tonight, in response to queries by Bloomberg News. Where? And "Tonight" i
205.
▲
by
hypfer
1mo ago
I find it interesting just how different the responses to this new tech are. I wonder if there is an inverse correlation between "usage of local models" and "despair", or if I am just making that up. It would make sense,
206.
▲
by
hypfer
1mo ago
Don't take this as dismissive or a dunk or anything like that, but maybe an LLM can help with unpacking? At least I know that they understand my writing and that they can help me understand other writing I don't. I can assure you
207.
▲
by
hypfer
1mo ago
This is what I'd call the "enabler" archetype that gets unhappy about friction (rightfully!) but takes some.. uh.. mental shortcuts when it comes to tracing back the source of it. I'm sorry man. The problem is that this
208.
▲
by
hypfer
1mo ago
It is correct that I have completely side-stepped your frame and not even attempted to engage with it. This is on purpose, because wanting people to engage with that specifically engineered frame is exactly the bad faith mechanism I've
209.
▲
by
hypfer
1mo ago
I am repeating myself, but this is about systems, and not about people. It is however in the interest of the people to keep the systems running in an untainted way. As said, on the individual level it's a tragedy, but one that can be a
210.
▲
by
hypfer
1mo ago
No, you can't make this secure. You're just tweaking who can pull that off and how. And, given that the main threat here is disinformation by nation state actors, they can also attack the camera module (or its supply chain) instea
More ›