4 ms·
I am repeating myself, but this is about systems, and not about people. It is however in the interest of the people to keep the systems running in an untainted
by hypfer 1mo ago
I am repeating myself, but this is about systems, and not about people.
It is however in the interest of the people to keep the systems running in an untainted way.
As said, on the individual level it's a tragedy, but one that can be absorbed somewhat. Democracy itself failing otoh is kinda hard to absorb.
C2PA is not "having security". It is "having an illusion of security for compliance and CYA reasons, that can be fairly trivially exploited by nation state actors".
Banality of evil. Again.
___
Actually, come to think of it, "security" is the wrong term there. Signatures don't secure anything. They attest.
Those are different things.
Argh and I ran with your term aah
- fwipsy 1mo agoThis is pascal's mugging. Democracy itself might fail! You're just inflating the stakes of your hypothetical bad outcome until it can overwhelm any positive upside. Not to mention, democracy is under just as much or more threat from "banal" fake news created by citizens. People gonna people. They don't need the DPRK lying to them to fool themselves.