hyperliner

40 ms·

31.
by hyperliner 9y ago
“Due to the sensitivity of personnel issues and the privacy of all involved, the investigation was kept confidential.” Wow, there is a predator in the group, but "privacy"?
32.
by hyperliner 9y ago
The leadership of this organization is complicit. It's disingenuous to pretend they "just found out." There are enough signals that indicate that they let "Dave be Dave." They let this continue on for years. Termina
33.
by hyperliner 9y ago
The biggest issue here is not that Dave is a creep and that he has been let go. The biggest issue is that the leaders of this 500 Startups organization let this go on for years without taking action. Who are the people who let their organiz
34.
by hyperliner 9y ago
Very useful. Is the issue then that there is a discrepancy between property rights and access rights that needs the CA Supreme Court to resolve? The Denny's (previous owners) used to CHARGE for access to the beach, presumably supportin
35.
by hyperliner 9y ago
The Denney's (previous owners) used to charge for people using their property to go into the beach. Maybe you should read instead of calling names and getting bent out of shape? "Joan Gallo, a former San Jose city attorney who re
36.
by hyperliner 9y ago
"Joan Gallo, a former San Jose city attorney who represents the land owner, agreed that the courts should weigh in. The Deeneys had run a private business, she said, allowing invitees of their choosing onto the property, and that hadn&
37.
by hyperliner 9y ago
(You may want to click in the linked article in the main article that OP posted)
38.
by hyperliner 9y ago
"So the coastal commission tried to broker a compromise, chief of enforcement Lisa Haage said. Officials offered to consider moving the access road, to find a nonprofit to operate the entry and to close on rainy days when the beach was
39.
by hyperliner 9y ago
But does he have that? That is the part that is unclear. Is there an easement in this property that somehow nobody seems to point to?
40.
by hyperliner 9y ago
If they are valid, and he shots and kills an intruder, would that be trespassing and he fearing for his life be a valid legal defense?
41.
by hyperliner 9y ago
I had read that too. It's clear that the beaches are public. But I would not trust a government employee. It's unclear to me that the Constitution guarantees my right to cross anybody's private property to access the public b
42.
by hyperliner 9y ago
Exactly. My gut tells me that the constitution guarantees beaches are public, but it does not guarantee the right to trespass on private property to exercise the beach right. But I have asked this question to understand if my understanding
43.
by hyperliner 9y ago
Is the question here not that Public Access if guaranteed constitutionally, but whether a single citizen should bear the cost of the public having to go through his property to access the beach? I can't tell what the Constitution says
44.
by hyperliner 9y ago
It's funny to see people here trying to protect something "because the Constitution" when the right to bear arms in the US Cobstitution is "archaic and should be changed."
45.
by hyperliner 9y ago
You mean trespassing into private property without a warrant?
46.
by hyperliner 9y ago
So it's the right to bear arms in the US Constitution, but that does not stop us from wondering whether it is archaic and whether it should be changed. Or is there a difference?
47.
by hyperliner 9y ago
US tax payer here. I'm going to stay away from discussing TurboTax from a political perspective. However, I have used TurboTax since the first year I had income. It's super easy. As my income has gotten complex over time (from sim
48.
by hyperliner 9y ago
I think it's because the political environment is so polarized that one must a) simply comment what an echo chamber expects to earn a cookie or b) nuance your answer or statements to make sure you are not blindly classified as "le
49.
by hyperliner 10y ago
It's only a fraud if you take the money and never deliver it. If you don't take the money or deliver within the stated parameters, how is it fraud? Many business sell product they don't have. It's a standard practice in
50.
by hyperliner 10y ago
Flaming not necessary. You were not called "wrong." You were asked whether you considered the possibility that you and the OP could be in agreement at least partially. PEOPLE: can we not take everything so personally please? It&#x
51.
by hyperliner 10y ago
I am sure a FB employee will invite her to stay at their house. I saw some of them protesting at the airport when the travel ban happened, and they looked like they really wanted to make a difference in the world. I bet this will happen, th
52.
by hyperliner 10y ago
It's just that every job is designed and paid for differently. I think the company simply has a budget to offer as payment for a certain outcome. Think about it from the opposite direction: a business owner could state I have never fu
53.
by hyperliner 10y ago
>>> While there’s ample evidence of the professional class using its economic and educational capital to preserve its advantages — think of the clustering of professionals into exclusive neighborhoods, or the early immersion of pro
54.
by hyperliner 10y ago
Let me replay what you are saying, using you as the subject: According to your [ubermonkey's] first comment here, you are a "long-term collector of mechanicals." Why do you ubermonkey do that? Isn't that just obsessive
55.
by hyperliner 10y ago
Patient pays doctor when patient is following instructions, not eating fast food, not smoking, etc? That would make it even.
56.
by hyperliner 10y ago
Why do you care that these companies go out of business? The answer is that you care because you need all the stuff you consume that comes from across the oceans. You care because you complain if the stuff you buy is more expensive, penaliz
57.
by hyperliner 10y ago
I have always wondered about this. While this is welcome, I am reading and can feel my blood pressure, stress level, and focus increasing as I read.
58.
by hyperliner 10y ago
How are facts relevant to this question? Seems the answer depends on your vision of the world, and as a result multipke different sets of facts can be used to make each argument.
59.
by hyperliner 10y ago
Loved your answer but adding some explanations for those of us not as smart as you: Deontological ethics or deontology (from Greek δέον, deon, "obligation, duty") is the normative ethical position that judges the morality of an ac
60.
by hyperliner 10y ago
"I think that Democrats are sometimes guilty of playing on fear and anger too, for example a resentful desire to smash elites without any realistic constructive analysis. I think that Sanders is admirable in many ways, but by inviting

More ›