5 ms·
"Joan Gallo, a former San Jose city attorney who represents the land owner, agreed that the courts should weigh in. The Deeneys had run a private business, she
by hyperliner 9y ago
"Joan Gallo, a former San Jose city attorney who represents the land owner, agreed that the courts should weigh in. The Deeneys had run a private business, she said, allowing invitees of their choosing onto the property, and that hadn't changed.
"It seems to us that it's an important issue to be litigated," Gallo said. "I have a strong belief that the Constitution doesn't require you to give up property rights or conduct a business you don't want to conduct."
Mark Massara — a surfer and attorney who is working with McClosky and the law firm Cotchett, Pitre & McCarthy on the case — said he believed the constitutional arguments have merit. But since that approach could drag on for years (think Geffen), his team opted for "a very narrow strike to the heart of this thing."
- deleted 9y ago[deleted]
- dang 9y agoYou've done staggering damage to this thread, posting something like 20 comments, most of which were inflammatory and several of which were copied and pasted. If you behave like this again on HN we're going to have to ban you. It leads straight to flamewars and this one was particularly wretched. We detached this comment from https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=14679391 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=14679391 and marked it off-topic.