3 ms·
Flaming not necessary. You were not called "wrong." You were asked whether you considered the possibility that you and the OP could be in agreement at least par
by hyperliner 10y ago
Flaming not necessary. You were not called "wrong." You were asked whether you considered the possibility that you and the OP could be in agreement at least partially.
PEOPLE: can we not take everything so personally please? It's killing the country and some good HN threads.
<EDIT>
And even if you were called "wrong," who cares? it probably just means that your argument "could be wrong" so it's not you. And if it's you, then consider it a great anonymous tip for life improvement! And if you prove that someone else's argument is wrong, then guess what: you just helped a fellow human!