huygens6363

5 ms·

1.
by huygens6363 2y ago
I know the feeling, yet you did not earn shit. You were on the right side of lucky and we tell ourselves stories of justice.
2.
by huygens6363 2y ago
No, but this matters how? It’s just an example of life being unfair.
3.
by huygens6363 2y ago
Just saying that’s life. Earning is a useless question.
4.
by huygens6363 2y ago
Life is uneven like that. Try to make the best of it. I am completely healthy while some are born into wheelchairs. I did not earn any of it.
5.
by huygens6363 2y ago
It’s their willingness to make up shit to appear more interesting that is at the heart of this. Being interesting or rather, being perceived as interesting, is core to their personality and they think that’s normal, but it is not. I don’t k
6.
by huygens6363 2y ago
That’s an .. interesting reaction to an unique and thoughtful gift.
7.
by huygens6363 2y ago
There weren’t nearly enough of those to go around. Even medical staff had trouble procuring these.
8.
by huygens6363 2y ago
> UI based SQL query builder Well, there’s your problem.
9.
by huygens6363 2y ago
Creating more than one entry is not a “scaling issue”.
10.
by huygens6363 2y ago
IMO way sooner. Some low hanging fruit tests would catch this before it’d even hit git.
11.
by huygens6363 2y ago
> We copy pasted the code it generated, saw everything worked fine, tried it in production, saw it also worked, and went on our merry way. Oh.. this is not good. How did you see it worked fine? You did not try inserting new customers?
12.
by huygens6363 2y ago
Thanks, there went my morning. That was quite the rabbit hole. I’m now confused and sad.
13.
by huygens6363 2y ago
“Scientist”? Is this like Software Engineer?
14.
by huygens6363 2y ago
I refuse to acknowledge anything but multiples of Libraries of Congress.
15.
by huygens6363 2y ago
Having to choose between what is actually good for you and what is “relaxing” and then deciding to divert all available funds to “relaxation” is not a money issue.
16.
by huygens6363 2y ago
For some reason, ignorance most likely, I'm not impressed. Looks relatively easy. Not for me, but for anybody with some math skills it looks easy to improve upon naive solutions. To be fair, a completely optimal solution definitely see
17.
by huygens6363 2y ago
Ah. I can understand the argument the streamers should be handled like all broadcasters currently are. Still think it's an.. awkward way to handle things, but that's up to Cadana. Ok, thank you.
18.
by huygens6363 2y ago
OK thank you for elaborating. I tend to assume that such laws - "let's listen in on everything you do" - need firm and solid justification. Coming up with a simple counter-example on first try signals to me the problem has no
19.
by huygens6363 2y ago
Yes, but I don't understand why. Is Netflix damaging them ("local news")? I don't see the relation and I'm assuming there is one. This feels like taxing McDonalds to support struggling local artists.
20.
by huygens6363 2y ago
This, so much this. I feel that society as a whole is eeking slowly into 80-90's level computing, but it is completely asymmetrical. Some parts of society are hyper-evolved, like social media and entertainment, but others are stuck in
21.
by huygens6363 2y ago
Sorry, but Canada demanding "internet money".. you got to be kidding me. https://southpark.fandom.com/wiki/Department_of_Internet_Mon... "In order to give the Canadians more money because, according to S
22.
by huygens6363 2y ago
Compared to.. protein folding, nuclear fusion? Sounds like a handful of parameters to me. What are computers good for if not looking for solutions in this space? It's strange to me that the cargo space has not been aggressively optimiz
23.
by huygens6363 2y ago
The “poor” seem to scrape by just enough to get access to Netflix, sports.. I don’t think this is a money issue.
24.
by huygens6363 2y ago
There is a model of a thing and there is a row that stores a representation of that model of a thing. They both are things. Ignoring the last one might be tempting, but it’s not practical. Interestingly your own way of thought is applied, b
25.
by huygens6363 2y ago
Broad range of users means keeping it simple and sticking to the standards. The complexity of government forms is not about fancy custom dialogs, elaborate data types or cute animations. There are usually a lot of (simple) questions. Yes&#x
26.
by huygens6363 2y ago
They did not have a “late start” etc. It’s not just luck. They just could not. Being clever in one way does not translate to being generally effective. Scientists would rule the world if that were the case. Yet they are with very, very few
27.
by huygens6363 2y ago
Indeed. I now know Firefox mobiles gives an infinity sign if you have more than 99 tabs open. These are all articles or topics I want to review. It’s definitely growing faster than I can review. There is just so much high-quality stuff out
28.
by huygens6363 2y ago
So they explain it to people as being able to catch criminals, but they known it won’t work against that? How can you maintain such a position? At some point you’ll have to explain your reasons for draconian measures like this. That’s why I
29.
by huygens6363 2y ago
It’s a disgrace indeed. This fragile, completely open and transparant, utterly harmless human rights paradise wants to just grow a tiny bit while this single, isolated, hostile, aggressive and jealous close-minded nation wants to control th
30.
by huygens6363 2y ago
Criminals are using specialty phones or should I say, were using, because this was recently cracked and thus became useless. Catching Taghi in NL was a famous result of that. Point is that dangerous people will use specialty devices/se

More ›