3 ms·

Sorry, but Canada demanding "internet money".. you got to be kidding me. https://southpark.fandom.com/wiki/Department_of_Internet_Money https://southpark.fando

Sorry, but Canada demanding "internet money".. you got to be kidding me. https://southpark.fandom.com/wiki/Department_of_Internet_Money https://southpark.fandom.com/wiki/Department_of_Internet_Mon... "In order to give the Canadians more money because, according to Stephen Abootman, Canada doesn't have enough money [...] They receive 10 million 'theoretical dollars', which ends up being useless for the Canadians." Anyway, I'm dumb and I'm not getting it even after reading it. What does Disney+ or Netflix have to do with "local news"?

smcin 2y ago
> Anyway, I'm dumb and I'm not getting it even after reading it. Per the article, they are proposing to tax streaming services in order to support local news, as they already do with licensed broadcasters.
- huygens6363 2y ago
  Yes, but I don't understand why. Is Netflix damaging them ("local news")? I don't see the relation and I'm assuming there is one. This feels like taxing McDonalds to support struggling local artists.
  - hostyle 2y ago
    Its to level the playing field. Licensed national broadcasters already have to pay a fee which ends up supporting local news / content. International streamers charging money to Canadians for their attention do not currently pay this fee. It seems only fair that all broadcasters / streamers should have to pay the same fee to access the same market.
    - huygens6363 2y ago
      Ah. I can understand the argument the streamers should be handled like all broadcasters currently are. Still think it's an.. awkward way to handle things, but that's up to Cadana. Ok, thank you.
      - smcin 2y ago
        Why shouldn't it (be treated the same as broadcasting)? Streaming is eating broadcasting alive. Streaming surpassed cable TV for the first time in July 2022 (in the US). (As to Canada levying a charge on them to fund local news, that's a whole other discussion.)

smcin 2y ago

> Anyway, I'm dumb and I'm not getting it even after reading it. Per the article, they are proposing to tax streaming services in order to support local news, as they already do with licensed broadcasters.

huygens6363 2y ago
Yes, but I don't understand why. Is Netflix damaging them ("local news")? I don't see the relation and I'm assuming there is one. This feels like taxing McDonalds to support struggling local artists.
- hostyle 2y ago
  Its to level the playing field. Licensed national broadcasters already have to pay a fee which ends up supporting local news / content. International streamers charging money to Canadians for their attention do not currently pay this fee. It seems only fair that all broadcasters / streamers should have to pay the same fee to access the same market.
  - huygens6363 2y ago
    Ah. I can understand the argument the streamers should be handled like all broadcasters currently are. Still think it's an.. awkward way to handle things, but that's up to Cadana. Ok, thank you.
    - smcin 2y ago
      Why shouldn't it (be treated the same as broadcasting)? Streaming is eating broadcasting alive. Streaming surpassed cable TV for the first time in July 2022 (in the US). (As to Canada levying a charge on them to fund local news, that's a whole other discussion.)