hueving

40 ms·

451.
by hueving 8y ago
People with smart phones don't follow me into my hotel room.
452.
by hueving 8y ago
People in general are far too immature to discuss politics. They are happy to spew opinions an complain about the ignorance of 'the other side' but they don't actually want to listen to other perspectives. Look at this thread
453.
by hueving 8y ago
None of what you says really applies in this case. According to the article the thing that triggered this was the failure to renew his contract. If it had renewal intervals, that means he wasn't legally entitled to 3 years. This is l
454.
by hueving 8y ago
Customers pay money. Users provide data and marketing.
455.
by hueving 8y ago
That's fine. The point is that adding an airline co2 tax should be met with co2 taxes on all petrol. The last thing you want to incentivize is a 737 worth of people all driving their own cars from LA to SF for the weekend instead of ta
456.
by hueving 8y ago
Right, this serves two purposes. It limits the visitor counts and also provides funding to deal with the fallout of visitors.
457.
by hueving 8y ago
As a tourist it's very difficult to know what activities are damaging when it's long-term damage over decades. The difference between harmful and safe activities often come down to the caretakers of the place you are visiting and
458.
by hueving 8y ago
>So if you're sitting in a really nicely paid high-tech job somewhere in SV, realise that you are the origin of this problem. A problem that causes damage to democracy in numerous countries. Maybe a little less arrogance? Tech compa
459.
by hueving 8y ago
Right, protecting an investment in R&D is a protection racket. There has to be some reasonable line between incentivizing investment and "everyone had a right to everyone else's ideas".
460.
by hueving 8y ago
This is an ad.
461.
by hueving 8y ago
UI look really only matters in competitive consumer markets. In B2B spaces where there are limited competitors and vastly different levels of investment involved for the users, the UI largely becomes irrelevant as long as it works.
462.
by hueving 8y ago
>It's a false claim to structural integrity. That's not how engineering works at all. Structures are either safe for the conditions or not. They don't have features that the public derives safety ratings for because that&#
463.
by hueving 8y ago
>That's a false accusation. The phrase you're looking for is "unfounded accusation". Unless you are the woman in question or you were stalking her 24/7, you can't falsify it.
464.
by hueving 8y ago
Relevant reading: https://www.theregister.co.uk/2016/01/31/ftdi_accused_of_bri...
465.
by hueving 8y ago
Your resolution alone will not likely uniquely identify you. The idea is to eliminate many of the data points that make it easy to track you across IPs. Resolution is very common if you're browsing with a maximized window so it's
466.
by hueving 8y ago
There is no correlation with open source and quality.
467.
by hueving 8y ago
Framing a recruiter asking for a github link as a question of contributing to the tech world is disingenuous. Stack overflow, Google, Apple, etc have contributed significantly more to the tech world than 99% of open source projects. Ruling
468.
by hueving 8y ago
>If you don’t even have that, well sorry, but I’m getting plenty of CVs through everyday. If you have a full supply of well qualified candidates, good for you because you are in the minority. However, most company's candidates are g
469.
by hueving 8y ago
Oblivious != passive aggressive.
470.
by hueving 8y ago
"American" is the term in the US because it's not tied to ethnicity. "Chinese" is tied to ethnicity.
471.
by hueving 8y ago
In my experience there is a lot of hostility to undocumented immigrants (a.k.a illegal immigrants) but very little to people to immigrate legitimately.
472.
by hueving 8y ago
> But even thought they have NOTHING to gain sharing This is wrong. They would have been ripped apart by people on the Internet if they switched to a proprietary protocol specific to Google for Google properties. Tech users brought the w
473.
by hueving 8y ago
Pretty rich for them to claim privacy is important when all of this technology is based on funneling your private data straight to them for storage and processing.
474.
by hueving 8y ago
Maybe for junior devs to get their foot in the door, but not for any higher level positions. You can't tell very much about someone's engineering skills based on some public commits to a side project and very few people (<1%) a
475.
by hueving 8y ago
This is a bit dramatic though because these robots can't reload themselves. Automated targeting for a single area is miles away from planning strategy, deploying battle groups, etc.
476.
by hueving 8y ago
Nobody cares that they make money. They care about it not being open source or having easy-to-migrate data (lock-in).
477.
by hueving 8y ago
Yet github has still had outages from being the target of nation-state attacks. The bigger the service, the worse the enemies.
478.
by hueving 8y ago
Speaking about statistical averages, not individuals. There are more men who can lift 50 pounds over their heads than women. It does not mean that a woman cannot be hired for a job that requires her to lift 50 pounds over her head. It means
479.
by hueving 8y ago
Averages say nothing about individuals. Do you avoid hiring black people due to higher criminal background rates in the US? If the pressure in the US is on average higher for males to focus on career, then that will influence overall percen
480.
by hueving 8y ago
Well they can't unless there are no other groupthink comments present. By definition a controversial comment isn't getting upvotes from a significant portion of the group so any regular "good" comment will quickly push i

More ›