>It's a false claim to structural integrity. That's not how engineering works at all. Structures are either safe for the conditions or not. They don't have fe

>It's a false claim to structural integrity. That's not how engineering works at all. Structures are either safe for the conditions or not. They don't have features that the public derives safety ratings for because that's impossible for the public to do under any kind of complex forces. A cable from a bridge doesn't mean anything about it's safety or support. It's nothing like the airbag example.