hnthrow90348765

12 ms·

91.
by hnthrow90348765 2y ago
>and the modern corporation just happens to be a tech company. I'd argue this is more aristocratic (or technocratic) social exclusion, which has gone on for far longer than compilers have existed. There does seem to be a persistent
92.
by hnthrow90348765 2y ago
I don't know, getting paid to try things out sounds like a good deal
93.
by hnthrow90348765 2y ago
Very few people are going to want to go up against Google and do it for nothing. At the end of this monumental quest, you only have just another browser. If it doesn't even make sense for Microsoft when they have an entire, ubiquitous
94.
by hnthrow90348765 2y ago
Staffing and maintenance are the business concerns for staying on old tech stacks. .NET developers should absolutely be taking them to the bank if forced to work on .NET Framework without being able to migrate it.
95.
by hnthrow90348765 2y ago
If you have lazy devs, sometimes you need to convince (or coerce, or force) them to get them out of their comfort zone and try something new. But typically this is done because management wants more while giving nothing in return which is w
96.
by hnthrow90348765 2y ago
But make some shallow games with generic, cell-shaded anime waifus accessed by gambling and they eat that shit up
97.
by hnthrow90348765 2y ago
It's been typical for me to get hiring managers/interviewers who don't feel it's a good question format for the job (this might be a .NET/C# cultural thing though). Since the day-to-day job rarely requires it, and I
98.
by hnthrow90348765 2y ago
Personally I think it's just their social circles that reinforce this, not the boogeyman MBA stuff. Because at some level, yes, they can be intimidated by technical people and this is a defense to avoid the "why am I even employed
99.
Stealth Interview: Undetectable Interview AI(stealthinterview.ai)
3 points by hnthrow90348765 2y ago|3 comments
100.
by hnthrow90348765 2y ago
Naturally this won't save you from actually being incompetent, but it's an interesting implementation aside from trying to cheat on your own My guess is companies are going to struggle to be able to counter this in the short-term
101.
by hnthrow90348765 2y ago
People will starting fighting against more houses being built to protect their wealth even more than now. You'll be earning like $25/hr at the factory and all the single-family houses are 300k+ with significant interest. Assuming
102.
by hnthrow90348765 2y ago
No one will want to do lower income jobs while the cost of living is high and continues to rise. Wear and tear on the body is also not compensated, not to mention healthcare being expensive. Meanwhile, I do CRUD apps and work remotely 20&#x
103.
by hnthrow90348765 2y ago
Feels like we're stretching the metaphor when we apply it to things that won't necessarily compound in complexity or time required to fix it. This is often the case with technical stuff because things can depend on one another, bu
104.
by hnthrow90348765 2y ago
Local-first is overkill for transient faults. This is probably meant for outage and disaster scenarios.
105.
by hnthrow90348765 2y ago
Well, it's Elon and DOGE, so you can't exactly start with assuming it's made in good faith and they simply haven't learned
106.
by hnthrow90348765 2y ago
Something tells me the savings for developer pay and cloud costs vs. COBOL+IBM is going to be invisible on a $14b admin budget (2024)
107.
by hnthrow90348765 2y ago
Earnings for contributing to human knowledge also needs to be higher, which is why lots of people don't choose those paths and have to commit to grinding corporate ladders.
108.
by hnthrow90348765 2y ago
It is mostly handwringing about unrealistic scenarios as these types generally assume that all militaries, emergency response groups, every book, factory, and source of expertise completely disappears and it's up to you, the lone hacke
109.
by hnthrow90348765 2y ago
><tangent opening line of my comment> From people on Reddit: Something that blows my mind- but is fully true "Hell, I've been in fucking EVE Online alliances that had better opsec than this." "I'll raise yo
110.
by hnthrow90348765 2y ago
My guess is that job requirements will grow even larger, so it will be better for people who like jumping around between front-end, back-end, infrastructure, database, product, support, testing, and management duties. You'll have to re
111.
by hnthrow90348765 2y ago
Obviously you just ask your company for a wider monitor so the sidebar takes up less space as a percentage, easy peezy
112.
by hnthrow90348765 2y ago
We have a jquery/Razor front-end that has a ton of global JS state manipulation and a file called 'common.js' which is a dumping ground for almost any function used in two places regardless of what it does. Many things are re
113.
by hnthrow90348765 2y ago
Hopefully we'll see non-US tech salaries increase due to its importance.
114.
by hnthrow90348765 2y ago
>An unrestricted market on housing will build houses up and down the price spectrum. I don't know, it would seem land costs would make up a higher proportion of the total cost of small low-cost individual houses, and if that's
115.
by hnthrow90348765 2y ago
This is a paper meant to explain what is happening in US cities and will obviously be US-centric.
116.
by hnthrow90348765 2y ago
I'd also think the creative input jumping mediums would also be a factor. Text to image is obviously a jump.
117.
by hnthrow90348765 2y ago
The economic cards seemed more stacked against workers, so resentment for managers builds more quickly than the opposite direction. Management who resents their workers can also fire them. Workers who resent their managers must go find anot
118.
by hnthrow90348765 2y ago
I want Elon to play EVE Online, it'll be a shitshow for him
119.
by hnthrow90348765 2y ago
>"A truly great engineering organization is one where perfectly normal, workaday software engineers, with decent skills and an ordinary amount of expertise, can consistently move fast, ship code, respond to users, understand the sys
120.
by hnthrow90348765 2y ago
Make them learn coding instead of adding yet another responsibility onto developers.

More ›