hkjgkjy

6 ms·

1.
by hkjgkjy 9y ago
The difference between front and backend web applications is nothing more but where the views are rendered - which on client side also means managing state and IO. This means Rails and Angular are doing the same job - the main difference is
2.
by hkjgkjy 9y ago
I don't think this is legal anywhere in Europe (is it?). I've also read that it's illegal in California, USA. In what regions is it allowed?
3.
by hkjgkjy 9y ago
What I personally found is that the days when I go straight home, have some food and then get coding, I get nothing done at home. Instead I feel stressed and it's no fun. Not a good way. When I instead pass the gym on the way home and
4.
by hkjgkjy 9y ago
If you are interested in following this idea even further, try Reagent in Clojurescript out. It works in the same way - it's all data. An example: (let [greeting [:div {:style {:background "green"}} "hello"]]
5.
by hkjgkjy 9y ago
I think it's more accessible - my designer friend felt sorry for me when working because I had "no pictures". Front end development usually means GUI programming, where graphics is the first world. You don't need to lear
6.
by hkjgkjy 10y ago
I think you have yourself a solid company idea right there. Go for it.
7.
by hkjgkjy 10y ago
True. I don't understand why many of us programmers are not interested in tools that eliminate the possibility of errors? * Why do we use memoy-unsafe languages (except when Rust or GC is unusable)? * Why do we use type-unsafe languag
8.
by hkjgkjy 10y ago
One of the reasons I prefer paying with Bitcoin over credit card, is that when using cryptocurrency I don't have to give them they key to my account - instead they give me an inbox that I send the value into. Guessing a lot of credit c
9.
by hkjgkjy 10y ago
HaveIBeenPwnd must be having a great day today!
10.
by hkjgkjy 10y ago
For others who don't know how much an American ton is, 6 mil of them = (5.44 * (10^9)) kilograms.
11.
by hkjgkjy 10y ago
Which is why I leave my door unlocked.
12.
by hkjgkjy 10y ago
Personally, I fail to see how that would be (except for stock holders of arms companies etc). Surely the American state would save a ton of money by having their army shrunk by 1/3. Population control? Is the US worried about there bei
13.
by hkjgkjy 10y ago
War! What is it good for?
14.
by hkjgkjy 10y ago
Cheers for the example. The Commons-Net library was where I ended up after some searching - so my experience is of someone who wants to get from 0 to 100 asap. Cheers and have a good day!
15.
by hkjgkjy 10y ago
Hi Mike! Big fan of your work! Have been for years, so it's a pleasure seeing you have replied to my comment. My latest example of this is the Apache Commons-Net Java package [0]. I wanted to make a toy Telnet server as an example for
16.
by hkjgkjy 10y ago
Former node dev, currently Clojure here. Npm has more abundance of good packages. They are typically better documented and easier to get started with, sadly :(. JVM has some really great stuff - things which are lightyears ahead of what is
17.
by hkjgkjy 10y ago
Just want to add that yeah, Thief is such a good game. If by chance the developers are reading this message board, thanks!
18.
by hkjgkjy 10y ago
Yup. The invisible hand is ruthless in that regard.
19.
by hkjgkjy 10y ago
It does, sadly!
20.
by hkjgkjy 10y ago
As a user, I actually just want my browser to contain less features. Vendors add and add and add features. If I want different user profiles, I already have many users on my OS - I just switch between them. When Chrome came out, I and many
21.
by hkjgkjy 10y ago
For Germany, it is easily solved by getting a lot of good labour from Spain and Italy. That equation works out less favourably for Italy and Spain, though...
22.
by hkjgkjy 10y ago
It's a cool concept - but surely there are a lot of regexps our there that will now trigger in vain. Also search engines will index "moz://a" as a different thing than "mozilla". Likely, the first will be
23.
by hkjgkjy 10y ago
What I meant was that [] when glancing just means the same as '(). I was thinking about it over the day, and realized maybe having special syntax actually is confusing - maybe "normal" lisp with only parens is better. Thanks
24.
by hkjgkjy 10y ago
I'm playing around with some ideas on this subject. My idea came about when I was checking the SHA256-sum of a binary. If the way you run a program (or a function) is by calling it by it's hash - then you can only get one program.
25.
by hkjgkjy 10y ago
> A company once invested more than an year developing a feature, which was rolled back in 1 day after users complained. Hah! I know that all too well. Great work!
26.
by hkjgkjy 10y ago
Surely many of us have thought about how this is a very doable thing. Many of my coworkers often leave their laptops unlocked, unattended when they head for coffee or otherwise. Nothing stops me from running a quick command, forever allowin
27.
by hkjgkjy 10y ago
Clojure developer here, was interested in Pixie since you announced it. The only reason why I have not tried it out yet is * No mention of installing it with `nix-env -i pixie`, `apt-get install pixie` or `brew install pixie`. Sorry, but I&
28.
by hkjgkjy 10y ago
It'd be nice if I could self-host it, or have it run behind a TOR hidden service.
29.
by hkjgkjy 10y ago
How is this "If 2 or more users demand <x feature>, it will be done" policy working for you? Have you used it in other projects prior to this? Curious to hear any stories :).
30.
by hkjgkjy 10y ago
It should be noted that you can even if you in 99.9% of cases don't want to mutate state. For the few times when you want to squeeze the last drop of performance, you can use transients[0]. [0] https://clojure.org&#x

More ›