historygurl

5 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by historygurl 3y ago

   Nah I was dismissing faux outrage at a guy saying whatever dumb shit, and those people basing their outrage in large part on such arbitrary jurisdictional issues. Outrage about the actual crime of human trafficking is of course called for b
2. 2.▲
   by historygurl 3y ago

   That is the context of the subthread to which you responded. Sorry if it wasn’t clear from my original post.
3. 3.▲
   by historygurl 3y ago

   Yes those are indeed real crimes and there are real ways to effect change with respect to those issues. RMS being a bozo isn’t a crime and internet outrage about it has no effect on real crimes. If you donate $5 to a charity helping those a
4. 4.▲
   by historygurl 3y ago

   Which just demonstrates how nuts this all is. You’re in this jurisdiction on day X it’s one crime, another jurisdiction on day X+1 it’s another crime. There are real crimes happening you can get upset about (and maybe even do something abou
5. 5.▲
   by historygurl 3y ago

   Indeed, plus what are you going to do otherwise? Google it. And how will you vet the pages Google returns? Intuition and common sense, and perhaps an appeal to authority.
6. 6.▲
   by historygurl 3y ago

   > Early on, ChatGPT knocked a bunch of highly technical questions I sent it out of the park I hear this all the time but never with a transcript. I wonder how much experts “read into” responses to make them seem more impressive. (Acciden