hiringmanager

7 ms·

1.
by hiringmanager 10y ago
No, they are not. Read the pre-amble to the bill of rights. It makes it clear the rights are broad and pre-existing for the Bill of Rights and the Bill of Rights merely clarifies. This is why the right to self defense cannot be restricted b
2.
by hiringmanager 10y ago
Right, which is why given there is no enumerated power clause giving them one the federal government has no power to regulate marriage. The problem is, the states legalized gay marriage at the state level, and DOMA which is invalid under th
3.
by hiringmanager 10y ago
IF by "in theory" you mean "under the constitution" and by "but" you mean "but in practice" then I agree with you completely. That is my point. In this area and many other areas of human rights, the
4.
by hiringmanager 10y ago
She gets no credit for pretending to be pro-gay rights after the fact. IT's not flip flopping its pandering. Trump doesn't pander. He doesn't care about gays much he's not courting the gay vote, but that's appropr
5.
by hiringmanager 10y ago
Thanks for that, I hadn't reached back to 2011 for my research. First off, reading this the way you intend, that makes him still less homophobic than hillary. When Oreilley says "they say this violates their rights" he s
6.
by hiringmanager 10y ago
You two don't seem to realize that the whole "kenyan muslim" thing -- birtherism and secret muslim- were campaign tactics used by Hillary. So, will you be consistent and say Hillary is a racist? (Would be consistent with her
7.
by hiringmanager 10y ago
Nobody opposed Obama for being black. Not even racists in the south. They couldn't care about that because they were too upset with the policies he proposed. The only people talking about Obamas race where Obama supporters who wanted
8.
by hiringmanager 10y ago
Republicans were not opposed to Obama because of his race, though for the past 8 years that has been the excuse to avoid talking about the issues. And once again, Liberals are not talking about Trumps positions, but merely calling him racis
9.
by hiringmanager 10y ago
Oh, I'm persuaded- just look at the actions of W and Obama - both moved the presidency closer to dictatorship. As for elections not being legitimate, that clam was made repeatedly, with merit, after 2000. The democrats lost, and they
10.
by hiringmanager 10y ago
Trumps authoritarianism is much less threatening than the same rhetoric from Obama or Hillary. A lot of people are advocating authoritarianism- in fact thats the point of this whole thread- whether we should "excommunicate" Peter
11.
by hiringmanager 10y ago
Also one of Hillary's campaign promises. And basically what Obama has been trying to do. Remember Hillary suggested that we should use a drone to take out Julian Assange. But we should be reminded about Trump taking this position and w
12.
by hiringmanager 10y ago
Your comment is a lot of projection of why people might support Trump. I'm not a fan of Trump, and my vote would go to Gary Johnson, but I hope Trump wins. Here's why: 1. I'm gay. Hillary Clinton has campaigned against gay m
13.
by hiringmanager 10y ago
I can say that the media took a sharp turn around 2000-2001 era, especially after 9/11. The rise of 24x7 news outlets and the internet (which has killed journalism in newspapers financially) turned it into basically a PR agency for th
14.
by hiringmanager 10y ago
Apple has made a big investment in both VR and electric vehicles. Tim Cook has spoken publicly- really rare- about the preference for AR, so he's already positioning the companies approach. This tells me that they have a compelling s
15.
by hiringmanager 10y ago
The fox, having investigated the crime at the hen house, has determined that no foxes did anything wrong and the allegations that hens were harmed is unsupported.
16.
by hiringmanager 10y ago
There's a real blind spot for SJWs to this kind of irony. They keep making these exact kinds of errors, over and over again, for instance advocating sexism or racism but thinking its ok because of the particular sex or race they choos
17.
by hiringmanager 10y ago
He's saying that women tend not to vote libertarian, not that they shouldn't be allowed to vote. Why misrepresent this (as so many have in this page) when we can all follow the link and read for ourselves? More context: " The
18.
by hiringmanager 10y ago
I am Gay. Hillary Clinton is on the record her entire career as opposing gay marriage. Trump, when questioned what he would do if he found out an employee was gay said "it makes no difference". As far as I'm concerned, the C
19.
by hiringmanager 10y ago
I care a great deal about the quality of elections in the USA and have been watching this issue since the 1990s. In 2001 there were real problems exposed, not just hanging chads but real problems with the way software counted votes. Result
20.
by hiringmanager 10y ago
I'd be happy to be at a company for 5-10 years and grow it, that's my preference. I don't want to be a mercenary. The problem is the companies are operating in a way that doesn't incentivize me to do os, by playing game
21.
by hiringmanager 10y ago
And companies turn out to be poorly run. With the 4 year vesting schedule, employees are incentivized to leave after a year to diversify their holdings.
22.
by hiringmanager 10y ago
>I'm indeed prejudiced against cowboy coders that want to jump from team to team, focus on picking up new tech for their resumes and do their best to avoid any maintenance work. Being at a company for a year doesn't tell you so
23.
by hiringmanager 10y ago
ICE cars are more complicated than phones, but I'm not sure pure-electric cars are that much more complicated. One of the nice things about the electric car business is the the part count is a lot lower, they are basically much simpler
24.
by hiringmanager 10y ago
Apple Kremlinology is a hobby of mine. I have seen a lot of little data points that support your hypothesis. Ive has a house in London, his family is in England. He brought in a major designer recently-a friend that was played off as a par
25.
by hiringmanager 10y ago
This is silly. What you think these are "bad" employees and the company is figuring it out in the 14th month? Or are you stuck in the 1950s era idea of loyalty and these employees are not "loyal"-- yet are you consideri
26.
by hiringmanager 10y ago
Your profile says you want to hire people, but your comment here says you are prejudiced. You're operating from the 1950s veiwpoint which is really a cultural hold over from the great depression- that employees should be desperate to f
27.
by hiringmanager 10y ago
You seem to imply that an employee being somewhere for one year is a bad sign. That seems like a prejudice. Sure, staying somewhere only 6 months can be a lack of fit. Staying somewhere a year, though, doesn't mean anything negative.