hhh1111

4 ms·

1.
by hhh1111 2y ago
"what did you think decolonization meant? Vibes, essays, papers? Losers."
2.
by hhh1111 2y ago
“Anti wokeism” is to atheism what wokeism is to Christianity. It can turn into a religion in its own right sure but it’s origin is disbelief in another ideology.
3.
by hhh1111 2y ago
That ad campaign was enabled by the 1st amendment but not motivated by it. You’re conflating why they wanted to do it with why they could do it
4.
by hhh1111 2y ago
[flagged]
5.
by hhh1111 2y ago
Differences in group outcomes are not logically equivalent to evidence of discrimination. For example, Asians, Jews and even Nigerian immigrants out earn whites and spend less time in jail than whites do. Is this racism against whites? No.
6.
by hhh1111 2y ago
This is a really funny response
7.
by hhh1111 2y ago
Group outcomes certainly differ and the differences ate measurable. But the measurements don’t support your argument much.
8.
by hhh1111 2y ago
That person would be wrong because there is objective, verifiable evidence to the contrary. There is none for the ubiquity and material impact of racism in 2025, sorry. So its more like him claiming Lyme disease or trench foot isn’t a socie
9.
by hhh1111 2y ago
They protested Starbucks all year after hallucinating some connection between the company and the Israeli invasion in Palestine. Irrational is a fine description. And a good example of the gas lighting is them saying wokeness doesn’t exist.
10.
by hhh1111 2y ago
The behaviors labeled as wokeness have been essentially dominant on the left for a long time though. “End whiteness” is a good example of woke rhetoric and that term was shouted for years
11.
by hhh1111 2y ago
wokeness is more or less southern Baptist fire and brimstone Christianity for posh urban white people. For western minorities it functions as a kind of nationalism
12.
by hhh1111 2y ago
[flagged]
13.
by hhh1111 2y ago
>a movement thats advocating for equity and trying to dismantle structural oppression. Well, for years those advocates did so with censorship, gaslighting, destruction of property, threats and calls for violence, etc. They had a hysteric
14.
by hhh1111 2y ago
This is a dishonest argument. Paul can oppose an ideology without agreeing with everyone and especially extremists who also oppose that same ideology. I dont think wokeness or paul graham are communist or fascist respectively so forgive the
15.
by hhh1111 2y ago
"Paul Graham is an idiot. Heres the real issue: [deliberately convoluted and unfalsifiable conspiracy theories]"