hellojesus

7 ms·

31.
by hellojesus 5mo ago
Thank you. This helps my understanding, and I would find this solution the proper one if we determine that this road must be walked. But I still have reservations that this would be the "foot in the door", because people like me w
32.
by hellojesus 5mo ago
I'm a licensed ham! Though I've never actually done anything ham-related. I just wanted a license plate with a call sign. But then I learned that anyone can look up my name and home address from my call sign and decided not to pub
33.
by hellojesus 5mo ago
The APL readers still get you without the cars transceiver. Plus if you have automatic tire pressure sensors, those are mandated to communicate in plaintext over rf when sending the data to the car, from my understanding, and you can farm t
34.
by hellojesus 5mo ago
The cars themselves phone home all the time. You have to physically remove the transceiver to prevent it or run a jammer nonstop at the risk of a felony.
35.
by hellojesus 5mo ago
Friday 1pm ET markets close, so news doesn't affect stock prices until the following Monday, giving emotions time to settle and everyone an approximately equal opportunity to react. This doesn't seem like market-moving material, b
36.
by hellojesus 5mo ago
Thanks. I appreciate the link. One thing I wasn't able to fully understand from the Kagi article: how does this solve the problem of "token handoff"? For example, if User A generates a token (from an unlimited search acct) an
37.
by hellojesus 5mo ago
> The whole point is that they CAN identify you (to verify your age), but in... well a privacy-preserving manner :-). But how can this be done so that the site and I'd verifier can't collude on a backchannel to unmask you? >
38.
by hellojesus 5mo ago
My desktop doesn't have Bluetooth. Does this mean I'd be doomed even if I had a compatible mobile device?
39.
by hellojesus 5mo ago
I know that's the final destination, but I didn't see that listed in the requirements page linked above. Any proof of this affecting the current implementation?
40.
by hellojesus 5mo ago
This is going to make my grapheneos journey a bit more exciting. How wild to force users through an official google identification for web browsing. Does the iPhone recaptcha app force you to login with a Google account? Seems we didn'
41.
by hellojesus 5mo ago
But you can't preserve privacy while rate-limiting token generation unless you have a way of identifying someone, which could be as simple as requiring an account. And even if it's illegal to hand them out, it's not hard to s
42.
by hellojesus 5mo ago
To date I haven't seen an implementation that preserves privacy and doesn't allow for easy bypass because person A generated infinite tokens and hands them out via a rest request.
43.
by hellojesus 5mo ago
Sure. But that means you can't make it illegal for a site to show you what a VPN is, how to use it, and explain that one shouldn't use it to circumvent a law but could, right?
44.
by hellojesus 5mo ago
Part of the reason we had the internet we did when we were kids was because it was so new and open. It still is just as new and open! It's mostly that large sites have emerged, and people have decided they like those more than forums,
45.
by hellojesus 5mo ago
How is this not a 1A violation?
46.
by hellojesus 5mo ago
Yeah. But it seems to be something I should do but never actually do, so I figured I'd ask randoms if they had a similar experience so I could try to use that data as evidence to convince my actual self to finally go through the "
47.
by hellojesus 5mo ago
Thanks for the reply. I've read about intrusive thoughts but discounted that as an outcome because it sounds like intrusive thoughts are generally unwanted and I haven't seen the outsized response documented alongside them. But I
48.
by hellojesus 5mo ago
Does anyone have experience with the emotional dysregulatiom bit and what that looks like as an adult? I have friends with adhd tell me that I have it, but my parents have suggested there was nothing present to indicate I had it as a child,
49.
by hellojesus 5mo ago
I haven't seen new data from celbrite in awhile, but I believe that grapheneos was the only truly secure phone from it for both bfu and afu as of a couple years ago. Apple lost my confidence after they removed Advanced Device Encryptio
50.
by hellojesus 5mo ago
This is quite solvable through the normal market process.
51.
by hellojesus 6mo ago
Thanks. I did find a space jobs site last week, and some jobs looked like they aligned closely. That's probably why I was surprised the nasa reqs weren't as broad. I wasn't really looking for a change; I have 1 and 3 year ol
52.
by hellojesus 6mo ago
Not in undergrad (a single upper division class), but yes in grad school. I did a lot of applied mathematics in undergrad and only took the min required upper division probability/stats class. I didn't find it interesting at the t
53.
by hellojesus 6mo ago
Fair. I think this is about the extent of my training, which was as an Applied Mathematics and Econ undergrad about 15 years ago: Partial differential equations : an introduction / Walter A. Strauss > https://libcat.cante
54.
by hellojesus 6mo ago
Thanks. I was dual questioning people that likely knew the answer and lamenting my life's decisions. I have no doubt that modern engineering students have CS know-how. It's almost a requirement for the modern world. But I was curi
55.
by hellojesus 6mo ago
I think it's a bit of, "Be the change you want to see". It may not be a bad thing to get tech folk with sense into these roles. They probably tend to have enough of a cushion to be able to refuse unethical work without worryi
56.
by hellojesus 6mo ago
Why is this called Nasa Force when the linked job is for an Areospace Engineer? The usa.jobs site only shows 15 open reqs for Nasa, and they are almost all engineering roles, save a few accounting/finance ones. Does that mean there are
57.
by hellojesus 6mo ago
I'm convinced they don't do exactly that because they know it would ultimately result in the Supreme Court overturning Filburn.
58.
by hellojesus 6mo ago
I think it should be repealed. It's legally baseless. How hard would it possibly be to get anti discriminatory Ammendments into the constitution? Surely at least 2/3 of reps are not that unfit.
59.
by hellojesus 6mo ago
Isn't OSHA already unconstitutional under current implementation due to competing intelligible principles? I agree they won't do it, but they absolutely should.
60.
by hellojesus 6mo ago
There's no way Roberts would vote to overturn this given his history of pretending a penalty directly remitted to the IRS for not carrying health insurance was not a tax for the whole ACA fiasco. But Filburn must needs be overturned. T

More ›