hef19898

18 ms·

181.
by hef19898 3y ago
Anything more recent backong up the, I quote, "strong, if circumstantial" claim? The claim sure is sensational and hood for headlines. If true, it would be quite a thing in the field of genetics. So I assume there was more than on
182.
by hef19898 3y ago
Oh, affaires do exist. Always have. They are, especially since divorce is socially acceptable, the minority. Personally, I don't have an issue with this, people are free to live their lives.
183.
by hef19898 3y ago
And all the studies done to understand those numbers show the difference in outcome is driven by tze social environment and esucation systems, and not the sexe. You, of course, will ignore that I am sure. I hate it when the menoshpere invad
184.
by hef19898 3y ago
There is the whole legal labyrinth around for-profits being owned by non-profits. Whether or not OpenAI adhered to tjose, I cannot say.
185.
by hef19898 3y ago
I think it ia really funny, that Elon and Sam are at each others throat. Those two truely deserve each other.
186.
by hef19898 3y ago
You seriously, unironically, link to the TV and Showbiz section of the SUN ? And there I was, thinking Twitter would be the worst source I see on HN... At least it is not a TikTok short.
187.
by hef19898 3y ago
As a photographer I know next to nothing about film, let alone cinema. Hence the question, is ARRI gear really as good as people say, and as expensive?
188.
by hef19898 3y ago
Heisenberg makes you think, doesn't he? As the developer of Hitler's bomb, which never was a realistic thing to begin with, he never employed slave labour for example. Nor was any of his stuff used during warfare. And still, he is
189.
by hef19898 3y ago
Both of those things are not true so.
190.
by hef19898 3y ago
Because that is the norm, more or less everywhere. Unless you count societies in which men have so much power they can do whatever they want. And come in, Genghis Khan? And then such a laughable claim? How about Casanova then?
191.
by hef19898 3y ago
The saw the wind and now reat the worldwind reasoning? Already deeply flawed back when Bomber Harris came up with it. Yes, once your initial defence is sucessful, you have no justification to turn around and become the aggressor. This is re
192.
by hef19898 3y ago
Appeasement was a failure. And enabled Hitler a lot . It also gave him legitimacy. And no, the USSR did not start the war, that "honour" goes to Germany. The USSR did grap its portion of Poland so. Regarding Munich, even worse, C
193.
by hef19898 3y ago
No, it doesn't.
194.
by hef19898 3y ago
There is no proof Hamas ever did that so. No investigation foind any, and there have been multiple. Not sure what to think of people that are ok with bombing hospitals for any reason at all, even the made up ones the parrot around. And no,
195.
by hef19898 3y ago
What? That Germany started WW2 by attacking Poland in cahoots with the USSR? How is that wrong? Edit: The European theatre, in Asia the war started earlier when Japan invaded China. The most commonly understood start of WW2 was thebinvasion
196.
by hef19898 3y ago
There is no proof that ever happened... And even if, no, you do not bomb hospitals if you do not want to be the baddy.
197.
by hef19898 3y ago
Proof forbthe claim about the US bombing the Netherlands please.
198.
by hef19898 3y ago
Well, there are things that cannot be bozt-sided: Everything that violates human right for example. Or direct threats to democracy.
199.
by hef19898 3y ago
Why did they take hostages? Because it was a terror attack? And no, of course there is no threat if suoerior military starts levelling the city around you, why would that be dangerous in anyway... By the way, the IDF already killed three ho
200.
by hef19898 3y ago
Yeah, sure. Wheather or not the leadership is alive or not is irrelevant. That's why the US ignored Bin Laden and Saddam. Oh, wait...
201.
by hef19898 3y ago
Dying for better vidoes and clicks is an influencer thing.
202.
by hef19898 3y ago
That was WW1, and even then it was Austria-Hungary's reaction to it, backed by Germany in combination with the political climate that started it.
203.
by hef19898 3y ago
That would exclude, e.g., every senate hearing of big tech. Or anti-trust case against big tech. Not sure this argument holds up to scrutiny.
204.
by hef19898 3y ago
Does the aggressor change? Yes, absolutely, it can and does. Shouod a war "just" end? Also, a resounding YES , a war should end as soon as possible. Unless, of course, one side just wants and needs the war to go on and on...
205.
by hef19898 3y ago
If I go by the German wiki page on the NPP Stade, e.ON (the operating company at time of shut down) cited economic reasons for the shutdown. As I said, either service life or economic operational limits.
206.
by hef19898 3y ago
True, I am not that well versed in American history without reading it up. In a sense the US got lucky, that events elsewhere opened them the door to take over North America: the Napoleonic Wars and the sale of the French territories, the S
207.
by hef19898 3y ago
And how would that work in a society that is heavily leaning to monogami? Or repsecting the womens voice in that? Or squaring that with the manoshperes whining about declining male fertility? And no, a man cannot realostically have hundre
208.
by hef19898 3y ago
Gaza is among the most densly populated areas on earth. By definition, any military installation is close to civilians. Same goes for a lot of IDF, and every other military, ehich has bases next to a city. Doesn't mean one just can ind
209.
by hef19898 3y ago
One, Hamas isn't doing this. No proof beyond the inevitable effects of fighting in one of the most densly populated areas on this planet. Two, Israel is doing an incredible good job at putting the pressure on themselves right now.
210.
by hef19898 3y ago
Yes, there a lot more civilians killed in Gaza every day than you could fit into a school. What Israel does is much, much worse.

More ›