headsoup

10 ms·

91.
by headsoup 4y ago
It's the simplest one, not the easiest one
92.
by headsoup 4y ago
Until her best friend says it does and she turns to you asking why you lied?...
93.
by headsoup 4y ago
Actually those people do provide specifics and substance, but people (as you here do) have a habit of generalising and dismissing with a broad stroke brush rather than doing some further investigation. The fact you even buy into using the t
94.
by headsoup 4y ago
If you think Fauci is honest and trustworthy you're part of the problem in trying to 'other' those calling out the lies. The culture of "the people on my side are good/right but not yours" is a big part of tod
95.
by headsoup 4y ago
And all of the other powerful and influential business and political figures? Unless Elon is some kind of special new liar?
96.
by headsoup 4y ago
Because it is not just about you. What of a white lie to protect the feelings of a loved one, lying to tell someone who is about to die something good, a lie to hopefully escape punishment? People do it all the time balancing their consci
97.
by headsoup 4y ago
That seems a very poor argument. I think the simplest one is that lying takes more energy and effort to support, the truth takes none.
98.
by headsoup 4y ago
I think we could turn the Guardian article's premise around (as this article hints to) and say "it's dangerous to think people shouldn't be allowed to think about or experience wrong things." It's obvious slipp
99.
by headsoup 4y ago
Pointing out flaws is a red herring? No, finding the flaws in western journalism takes more effort because it's not as obvious. Which means the rulers can get away with propoganda and manipulation much more easily than one who provide
100.
by headsoup 4y ago
I mean the UK stopped reporting vaxxed vs unvaxxed back in May and I believe they've also stopped or reduced reporting on birth rates. There are other reports that have stopped but I'd have to go digging to grab them again. That
101.
by headsoup 4y ago
What if you knew myocarditis could have a risk of complications and your doctor said that? Wouldn't you prefer the doctor said 'generally it's temporary and will go away, but there are some potential complications and you sh
102.
by headsoup 4y ago
If you read what I linked above, this is specifically what the CDC is failing at (the CDC is responsible for reviewing adverse events).
103.
by headsoup 4y ago
Depends if you believe everything that comes out of a dictatorship is a lie. How untrue is it? We know it's under-reported, but who do you trust to find the truth? The question is, do you think it is easier or harder to spot the li
104.
by headsoup 4y ago
Wow straight to the fascism argument, nice. I fail to see at all how sacrificing the young and healthy for the old and ill is not fascism, but sacrificing the old and ill for the young is? Isn't a component (not all...) of fascism an
105.
by headsoup 4y ago
Ooh yes, googling, the way to get the true and correct data first time, every time. Unfortunately at this point there is no way to see if the vaccines have actually saved lives because a) they don't stop the virus or its spread, it is
106.
by headsoup 4y ago
What is your point? I don't think you read what I linked at all.
107.
by headsoup 4y ago
Before covid vaccines came around, if a doctor said to you "don't worry, that myocarditis is just a passing nuisance," what would your response have been? Or put another way, if you had this from covid itself and someone said
108.
by headsoup 4y ago
Not necessarily. In the US they weren't even monitoring for them: https://boriquagato.substack.com/p/how-do-you-miss-the-most-...
109.
by headsoup 4y ago
This of course assumes that other online commenters (or sources) apparently have no experience or credentials in providing the information. Way too much credentialism of late.
110.
by headsoup 4y ago
Curiously they mostly stopped reporting on that this year. Below 50's were never even close to high risk and as soon as it was known (which was very) the vaccines didn't prevent spread they should have immediately been halted for
111.
by headsoup 4y ago
Yeah it definitely makes sense to sacrifice the children for the elderly, I mean what good are the kids of tomorrow without the old of today. In other words I'm saying that's a silly analogy
112.
by headsoup 4y ago
Ah, it's a conspiracy when these countries 'do well' but everything you are told in the West is true huh?
113.
by headsoup 4y ago
No, we don't have an understanding of their safety. Have you not noticed how most of the data is not even reported on now and near all previous studies stopped at three months? Even the study on interrupted menstrual cycles stopped a
114.
by headsoup 4y ago
Just need some governments to mandate them, then no worries
115.
by headsoup 4y ago
Until you see them buying massive mansions and hiding their money away and even that is a lie too. If you could show me one truly charitable thing they've actually done, rather than ego reinforcing projections, I'm listening. Sur
116.
by headsoup 4y ago
Sorry but no. They absolutely know what they were doing was wrong. They just felt right about it. Don't make excuses for white collar criminals.
117.
by headsoup 4y ago
I think you have to factor in the amount of technology (i.e. video review of technique, mocap, etc), training level, 'performance' programs (diet, additives, etc) and of course pay/background funds these athletes compete thro
118.
by headsoup 4y ago
But isn't the 'net positive', itself only a factor in the very last stage of all of the input energy required for ignition? So they need to factor in all other components before looking at these orders of magnitude being use
119.
by headsoup 4y ago
What will the ratio be once the reactor does come online?
120.
by headsoup 4y ago
With the patents and centralised control some people dream of. I think this is something to be very cautious of.

More ›