hYKdTfpa

8 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by hYKdTfpa 6y ago

   The attacks on him were dubious at best.
2. 2.▲
   by hYKdTfpa 6y ago

   Well, this article is at least in part about the effect if deep fakes on women in politics.
3. 3.▲
   by hYKdTfpa 6y ago

   I'm not convinced this will be as big of a problem for national security as suggested. Pornographic images can't be broadcast and can't be shared on Facebook. Twitter can already label deep fakes iirc. The focus on women poli
4. 4.▲
   by hYKdTfpa 6y ago

   This is the best argument for this change.
5. 5.▲
   by hYKdTfpa 6y ago

   This change does no good, it serves only to allow people to virtue signal.
6. 6.▲
   by hYKdTfpa 6y ago

   Do we really have to examine the origin of every word we use rather than according its modern common usage and use in context?
7. 7.▲
   by hYKdTfpa 6y ago

   >I for one think it's great that people are willing to make things a little more accessible for more people. How does this make anything more accessible for anyone?