gtsop

7 ms·

31.
by gtsop 1y ago
To which citizens are you talking to exactly? There are a few very rich citizens that always had control of the government and clrealy want this bill to pass. On the other hand there is a majority of other citizens which don't have the
32.
by gtsop 1y ago
I see your point but no, it's getting objectively worse. I have a similar experience of casually using chatgpt for various use cases, when 5 dropped i noticed it was very fast but oddly got some details off. As time moved on it became
33.
by gtsop 1y ago
Over 10 years writting front ends. I hate react, but this article is junk, it advocates for new "reacts". This exact mentality is what got us the bad parts of React, and it's going to give us the bad parts of whatever next li
34.
by gtsop 1y ago
I know the whole story in depth and you keep iterating over the same thing. If this person has indeed mental issues, to publicly expose it in a degrading light does not help him, or anyone else really. If he doesn't have mental issues
35.
by gtsop 1y ago
I am sick of people raising this developer's mental issues. This is 2025, we should be sympathetic and encouranging to any human being struggling with mental issues, helping them get through or at least not trip them or sideline them.
36.
by gtsop 1y ago
When you do MCP-style applications, an LLM is more like RegEx on steroids, and since you expect your regex to return the same matches on the same input, it is a very desirable attribute for LLMs as well. I would say it is more than desirabl
37.
by gtsop 1y ago
> if the tool was that good people would be beating down their doors to get it. Microsoft is a software company. They wouldn't have released this to begin with to have an extreme competitive edge!
38.
by gtsop 1y ago
Your response is an exact proof of what I said in my comment. Thanks Edit: Ok elaboration for the well intended. There is a HUGE overlap of LSP and ACP. LSP solves the problem of "oh we have many IDEs and many language integration plug
39.
by gtsop 1y ago
Because there is no ai hype in LSP. AI is literally going through the same phase as early javascript libraries did. An explosion of tools, completely ignoring/bypassing previous accumulated knowledge, solving the wrong problems with th
40.
by gtsop 1y ago
Show us the numbers, stop wasting our time. NUMBERS. Also, why would I ever believe kangaroos exist if I haven't seen any evidence of them? this is a fallacy. You are portraying the healthy skepticism as stupid because you already know
41.
by gtsop 1y ago
No i don't but by your post it seems like you do. Show us, that is all i request.
42.
by gtsop 1y ago
Two years in and we are waiting to see all you people (who are free of our tunnel vision) fly high with your velocity. I don't see anyone, am I doing something wrong? Your words predict an explosion of unimaginary magnitude for new cod
43.
by gtsop 1y ago
This classic reductionist argument is so trivial it could havr been automatically posted by an LLM. The majority of those people say they regreted the collapse of the Soviet Union. Not sure where your fantasy facts of "did not work&quo
44.
by gtsop 1y ago
While the reasoning I believe to be utterly littered with weak arguments, I agree with the final conclusion/question of the author. But what the author isn't clearly saying is that he is describing a free market opposed to a plann
45.
by gtsop 1y ago
> If some people can't be reasoned with, what is Rossmann supposed to do ? Just stop interacting? When you have an argument with your colleague, do you go on twitter and post all your conversations and tell everyone how irrational h
46.
by gtsop 1y ago
Is it really a strawman? At some point, the code would need to identify rossmann. Please elaborate on the techniques required to do it and how it could be obfuscated. GOS doesn't use an account, so the code would have to perform very t
47.
by gtsop 1y ago
> Just curious, but who is muddying waters, and how ? In the context of this whole rabbit hole, pretty much all of the parties. When you bring someone's dirt put in the public, not to support an argument but just to attack them beca
48.
by gtsop 1y ago
So rossmann literally feared of a patch that was like this getting into graphene if (user is rossmann) { // do bad things } makes me think who is paranoid here.
49.
by gtsop 1y ago
As a long time GOS user I just want to remind what a joy it is to see my very old phone outlive flagships due to the lack of bloatware. I upgrade phones just for a single reason: it has been physically hit so hard over the years that it sto
50.
by gtsop 1y ago
This is a very interesting summary indeed, however I think matters are simpler and noone needs to dive that deep. Unfortunatelly, EVERYONE, from all parties, fire shots for the wrong reasons, which perverts the discussion. When you say to p
51.
by gtsop 1y ago
Can you elaborate on why this is a risk factor? What do you mean by saying we're giving him root? If a person is paranoid of being chased i would expect them to put even more effort into the security of the OS he develops, not to add b
52.
by gtsop 1y ago
What was the initial incentive for people to publish on the internet before ad revenue was a thing?
53.
by gtsop 1y ago
Why on earth are you accepting his premise that there are billions of successful requests? I just asked chatgpt about query success rate and it replied (part): "...Semantic Errors / Hallucinations On factual queries—especially leg
54.
by gtsop 1y ago
> more like 'thinking' than 'knowing'. it's neither, really. > After all, they are designed to apply logical relationships between input nodes They are absolutelly not. Unless you assert that logical === stati
55.
by gtsop 1y ago
> There is zero intelligence on it 100% with you. LLM is good enough i believe. No need to invent anything new.
56.
by gtsop 1y ago
Right now they only thing being left behind is my actual work to be done since I am spending more and mpre time fighting off cursor-written degenerate slop code from creeping into the codebase from "pioneer" developers who are slo
57.
by gtsop 1y ago
> that senior devs are extremely in demand Is this true? I am not seeing salaries rising, the demand seems to be met. But maybe I'm wrong.
58.
by gtsop 1y ago
Care to explain? I am honestly clueless
59.
by gtsop 1y ago
> don't know if you have ever worked in a larger team that lacked someone to make decisions, take responsibility and set a strategy I had once. The ultra micro-managing boss went to surgery and was off for two months. The whole com
60.
by gtsop 1y ago
If you don't need to prove it to me then you you wouldn't have replied to my initial comment to begin with. But I agree, you don't need to prove anything to me. You need to proove it to yourself first.

More ›