gtsop

9 ms·

61.
by gtsop 1y ago
He is probably just a bot
62.
by gtsop 1y ago
I am waiting to see your 4 year human-equivalent project in a couple of months. Words without actions are junk. You are asserting something you have no proof for. Proove it then. Amaze us all with your productivity, out in the open. Shred t
63.
by gtsop 1y ago
I am honestly convinced these are AI comments. They fail to answer the question of what sort of work they see the x20 improvements, just like Chatgpt fails to answer my hard technical questions.
64.
by gtsop 1y ago
You did not answer the question
65.
by gtsop 1y ago
I cringe when I see these numbers. 20 times better means that you can accomplish in two months what you would do in 4 years, which is ridiculus when said out loud. We can make it even more ridiculous by pointing out you would do in 3 years
66.
by gtsop 1y ago
Are you willing to be compensated with compute credits for your job? Such companies spit out "credits" all over the place in order to gain traction and enstablish themselves. I remember when cloud providers gave vps credits to sta
67.
by gtsop 1y ago
> it's not likely actual neo-nazi's, they are too dumb to manipulate an infobot. No they are not. There exist brilliant people and monkeybrains across the whole population and thus the political spectrum. The ratios might be di
68.
by gtsop 1y ago
I admit i half-read this second link, but the essential nuance it adds is that the ruling process didn't allow the violators (see: companies making it extremely hard to come out of a subscription) to do their homework in order to drill
69.
by gtsop 1y ago
> I think it is useful and even necessary to ask questions like the following: “if someone engages with this system, and comes to the conclusion that it has ethics, what sort of ethics will they be likely to believe the system has? If th
70.
by gtsop 1y ago
No. Why would you ever want to amplify a false understanding that has the potential to affect serious decisions across various topics? LLMs reflect (and badly I may add) aspects of the human thought process. If you take a leap and say they
71.
by gtsop 1y ago
> Which is easier for you to remember: facts you’ve seen a hundred times in your lifetime, or facts you’ve seen once or twice? The human brain isn't a statistical aggregator. If you see a psychologically socking thing once in your l
72.
by gtsop 1y ago
So is the expectation for it to suggest obvious solutions that the majority of people already know? I am fine with this, but let's be clear about what we're expecting
73.
by gtsop 1y ago
> He has gone from one extreme (categorizing all notes obsessively) to the other extreme (wiping all notes, to start fresh). No, he went from extreme to "in the middle", if you find yourself in their place you should do EXACTLY
74.
by gtsop 1y ago
> I don’t want to manage knowledge. I want to live it. This is the essence! Very good post. I think the nuclear action was perfect, it was neede to get out of the loop. You should write your thoughts, not copy paste others'. This wa
75.
by gtsop 1y ago
CL/CB - Continuous Liberation / Continuous Bombing it's the ci/cd of american foreign poliyics
76.
by gtsop 1y ago
> For something to play out, it has to start. For something to start, someone has to start it. When no one is willing to start it, then it will never play out. Very insightful, but the iranian minister had already started talks with the
77.
by gtsop 1y ago
Thinking is still currently unique to living things, so you don't need to resort to what you describe to find the human brain uniquness. Onto what you describe, it has to do with memory. Memory is storing and playing back sensory input
78.
by gtsop 1y ago
Are we still tossing around the 10x productivity boost? Please make this stop. I see first commit on April 28 so by 10x productivity its like you've been working on this for almost 2.5 years, and there is still a waiting list on the we
79.
by gtsop 1y ago
> I think solving memory is solving agi. But we already have AGI
80.
by gtsop 1y ago
I lol when I see such comments downvoted. I'd love to see some written rationale for the downvote.
81.
by gtsop 1y ago
> , it attempts to normalize the intimidation and censorship of truths Very muddying statement. The normalization of intimidation and censorship has already happened by those in power, a comment can only acknowledge the reality of it. &g
82.
by gtsop 1y ago
Ignore all laws?? EU has officially recognized the utility of these criminal agencies. Of course under the all-time-classic umbrella of "legitimate use for law enforcement" which in common means "go ahead and use it freely, i
83.
by gtsop 1y ago
Your use case is simplistic so it dismisses actual use cases. People make money on youtube through ads, you can't do that (as effectively) on your own server. This also ties with the analytics. Some organisations like the ready-made ad
84.
by gtsop 1y ago
Organized working people have the capacity to change everything. That's my opinion at least
85.
by gtsop 1y ago
Yes CEOs are to blame, but blaming them isn't gonna do anything. They won't change. Who has the motivation and capacity to change things? The working people. Who isn't currently doing it? The working people. So it seems appro
86.
by gtsop 1y ago
> Unfortunately Capitalism unhindered by regulation is what we wanted No "we" don't want it. And those who do want it, let them go live in the early industrial England whete the lack of regulation degenerated masses. Also,
87.
by gtsop 1y ago
All the problems regarding AI will be anwered way sooner when people stop calling intelligent that which is literally as dumb as a rock. There is absolutelly 0 intelligence in current state-of-the-art ML programs. Intelligence is not the ab
88.
by gtsop 2y ago
Which is why I dislike non gplv3 open source software so much. It allows the pests to live on.
89.
by gtsop 2y ago
Because they are clearly against users' rights, the only thing GPL is trying to protect. The exact technicalities I believe are not very important (yet they might be interesting).
90.
by gtsop 2y ago
It is the best outcome by preventing an even worse outcome, not for the worker of course, for the corporations and the US economy in general.

More ›