grzm

59 ms·

631.
by grzm 7y ago
Open source announcement, 18 days ago, over 150 points, over 70 comments: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=21926666
632.
VCS Nirvana(paulhammant.com)
1 points by grzm 7y ago|0 comments
633.
EURion Constellation(en.wikipedia.org)
1 points by grzm 7y ago|0 comments
634.
Anti-Vaccine Activists Doomed a Bill in New Jersey(nytimes.com)
2 points by grzm 7y ago|0 comments
635.
by grzm 7y ago
(2015)
636.
Two Computer Geeks from Portland Unleashed the Viral Video Game of the Year(wweek.com)
2 points by grzm 7y ago|0 comments
637.
Margaret Hamilton knows how to fix Big Tech's problems(fastcompany.com)
3 points by grzm 7y ago|0 comments
638.
by grzm 7y ago
'blargmaster33's account is dead, likely due to their karma (-18).
639.
by grzm 7y ago
Downvotes are available to members with 500+ karma.
640.
by grzm 7y ago
I can no longer follow what you're arguing, nor do I think you're considering what's been presented to you. Have a good day.
641.
by grzm 7y ago
Orthogonal to what? The point is there is no "owner" of SQL in the way Oracle claims to own the Java API.
642.
by grzm 7y ago
> So is Java, but here we are. > https://www.cnet.com/news/sun-wins-java-iso-approval/ That article describes when Sun was recognized as an official submitter for a proposed standardization of Java. It
643.
by grzm 7y ago
> "I wonder who owns SQL." I don't know what it would mean for someone to "own SQL". It's an ISO standard: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SQL#Interoperability_and_stand...
644.
by grzm 7y ago
Sometimes new accounts get (mistakenly) caught in anti-abuse filters. If it was [dead], that’s likely what happened. If it was [flagged][dead], it was the result of user action. In those cases, vouch as you did. You can also email the mods
645.
Managing my personal knowledge base(tkainrad.dev)
4 points by grzm 7y ago|0 comments
646.
by grzm 7y ago
Nope. Some sources, such as Medium embed viewer-dependent identifiers in the url which can confound de-duping based on URL alone. I don't know if 'dang et al have figured out a way to handle these cases.
647.
by grzm 7y ago
Nit: s/stationary/stationery/
648.
by grzm 7y ago
If “the shock” were meant to be interpreted as medical shock, I would expect the definite article to be omitted. Compare: He died of shock. (medical condition) He died of the shock. (single, definitive event, e.g., fright or shock wave)
649.
by grzm 7y ago
> "I vouched your comment which was dead, but I think it's deliberately obtuse." If a comment is dead and you think it's unhelpful ("deliberately obtuse"), don't reward it by vouching for it. It'
650.
by grzm 7y ago
Explosions can cause shock waves which can cause injury in and of themselves (as opposed to injuries cause by thrown objects or fire). This could be what they're alluding to. I couldn't access the document[0] referenced in the Wik
651.
by grzm 7y ago
https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/sneak > sneak verb > \ˈsnēk\ > sneaked \ˈsnēkt\ or snuck \ˈsnək\; sneaking" Whether a verb is weak or strong in English can change over time and dialect.
652.
by grzm 7y ago
The mods don’t see every comment, so if the goal is to let the mods know, email is the most reliable way. Of course it’s up to them how to act on it. Just commenting isn’t going to improve anything, as they legitimately might not see it. It
653.
by grzm 7y ago
(a) The submitter changed the title when submitting. (b) A mod changed the title after it was submitted. (c) The site changed the article title after it was submitted. I suspect (b), given the baity-ness of the article title: "Our Neop
654.
by grzm 7y ago
Also, a submission on the project submitted 3 days ago did get significant traction: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=21926666 141 points, 75 comments
655.
by grzm 7y ago
“Irrational” is not what I intended by “seriously consider Apple or IOS”: my intent was that after having considered the trade offs and what Apple is likely to do in the future, Apple and iOS are not something you would seriously consider a
656.
by grzm 7y ago
> ” So you're dismissing my questions about CarPlay (not even it's virtues)” No. That’s why I opened with what for me would be the most compelling reason for CarPlay to be a deal breaker: integration with apps already on my d
657.
by grzm 7y ago
> "I won't say how I know" Why so mysterious? ;) Do you have a pointer to anything that predates the link I provide? From what I gather, that's the website of one of the listed authors. If you have an earlier link t
658.
by grzm 7y ago
Having the same apps on your phone available on the media display in the car is quite compelling. For someone in the Apple ecosystem, that means CarPlay. Would you ever seriously consider an Apple iPhone? Given comments you've made reg
659.
by grzm 7y ago
> "Having never used CarPlay, I don't understand why it's a deal breaker." Deals are context dependent. This should read "a deal breaker for <someone>". Clearly it's not a deal breaker for you,
660.
by grzm 7y ago
Looks like it goes back to at least November, 2011: https://web.archive.org/web/20111103024132/http://colinm.org...

More ›