gridlockd

207 ms·

1951.
by gridlockd 8y ago
React itself can easily be used as a drop-in much like jQuery, but then you will be using plain Javascript syntax, which is a bit less readable than JSX. If you're planning to use JSX, you'll need a JSX transpiler and before you k
1952.
by gridlockd 8y ago
> Due to the proliferation of many advanced JS libraries such as React and Angular, do you think jQuery is on its way out? Absolutely. > Is becoming good at jQuery a waste of time? Unless you are going to be maintaining legacy code, y
1953.
by gridlockd 8y ago
Why is the income of the 0.01% rising so drastically? Because it is based on assets like stock and real estate, which are inflating at a rate completely detached from the actual economy. Why are asset prices inflating? Because of a policy o
1954.
by gridlockd 8y ago
That's besides the point. Individually , they don't have to agree on anything and still pose a danger. What you can't say is that this is some sort of organization that poses a threat as such. It is a bunch of random peopl
1955.
by gridlockd 8y ago
> It appears that you aren't very familiar with 4chan or 8chan based on your other posts about not knowing much about them. I never said anything like that. I said I haven't been on 8chan before today. You shouldn't lump
1956.
by gridlockd 8y ago
> ...they're now websites where people incite and plan violent crimes. Can you cite any evidence that people are planning crimes on a public-only anonymous forum that has no vetting of its members? Again, there are Nazi forums tha
1957.
by gridlockd 8y ago
"Being serious" about their own beliefs is different from taking another anonymous poster serious. On there you have literal Nazis, MAGA people and white identitarians all disagreeing and trolling each other. They can't eve
1958.
by gridlockd 8y ago
> That's not true... What exactly isn't true? The guy did have that Twitter. https://www.nzherald.co.nz/resizer/4vW9tadY1zUt-CwkgRo6DWG7N... > ...and it's notable that you had to create a new accou
1959.
by gridlockd 8y ago
Who says I take it at face value? Even if it was 100% non-serious shitposting, it would be sad. I guess you're implying though that there's some sort of elaborate false-flag operation going on there?
1960.
by gridlockd 8y ago
> 4chan and 8chan have been linked to almost all of the white nationalist and incel shooters of the past decade. You can say the same about Twitter and Facebook. In fact, the guy had a Twitter where he posted guns and ammunition with slo
1961.
by gridlockd 8y ago
I understand how they can cost that much. They're made in small numbers, by some artisans in Italy, presumably with the best of materials and to the highest standard. You can put an arbitrary amount of effort into anything. The quest
1962.
by gridlockd 8y ago
If ground-up rhino horn isn't actually a working aphrodisiac, how come these animals are being hunted towards extinction in parts of Asia? Same answer: People are desperate to be fooled.
1963.
by gridlockd 8y ago
> You should start making and selling espresso machines then, since you know more than coffee professionals about them. That doesn't really follow. If I think five-figure coffee makers that perform a rather simple mechanical functio
1964.
by gridlockd 8y ago
I do, actually. Luckily, none of them involve spending thousands of dollars on ultra-premium equipment whose advantages are completely imaginary. I understand how an espresso machine works. If somebody is charging you five figures for one,
1965.
by gridlockd 8y ago
It's actually reasonable. There's a little animation that show "live" updates to donation value. If you were to implement this, would you have every active client update live on the actual amount of donations, or would y
1966.
by gridlockd 8y ago
It wouldn't be "upscale espresso" if the machine didn't cost 10,000$. If you look into the audiophile community, there are people that have gone crazy spending absurd amounts of money on equipment that's basically
1967.
by gridlockd 8y ago
> Which is neither here, nor there. It's actually kind of the same argument you are making: Look at the "poor" 90%, except in global terms. > Wealth is social, not absolute. I don't know what "wealth is social
1968.
by gridlockd 8y ago
> Who exactly does "all the things"? Those people he is observing and who he is trying to live up to. > Over 80% of Americans live paycheck to paycheck [1] ...which merely means their lifestyle is more lavish than if they ha