greenwoman

5 ms·

1.
by greenwoman 5y ago
At that weight and price it's competing with desktops. They're cheating. That thing is as portable as stone henge.
2.
by greenwoman 5y ago
That's meaningless marketing nonsense.
3.
by greenwoman 5y ago
So it's a graphics editing workstation for the laymen with too much money. And that's fine. But it's not a developer system.
4.
by greenwoman 5y ago
Doesn't need more explanation. That touch bar was very useful.
5.
by greenwoman 5y ago
I get that, but what about aesthetics? I stare at that part of the screen every time I use the computer. Now I'm looking at a black square hole.
6.
by greenwoman 5y ago
If I take away anything from the new MBPs it's that they are the product of groupthink. A notch and 120Hz only makes sense for phones that scroll and use faceid. That screen would've been a win if the camera had been pinhole, whic
7.
by greenwoman 5y ago
It IS shoplifting, exactly as Walgreens claims, and that's happening because San Francisco refuses to prosecute thieves. It's bad when essential business exits the city over government mismanagement, but even worse when the govern
8.
by greenwoman 5y ago
I strongly prefer the Intel 16 inch design with the touch bar, USB C and a regular screen. Would have been great if they had cut the 1960s headphone jack as well. In no rush to get the new MBPs. And I don't get the need for that notch.
9.
by greenwoman 5y ago
Looking at the past 100 years of change, progress, and war, what do you think the odds are there will be anyone left to view your website in 500 years? Or that the web will be anything like it is today? Or that English will even be in use t
10.
by greenwoman 5y ago
Chapter 11 of the selfish gene from 1976 plainly states this.