Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
gr3yh47
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
31 ms
·
271.
▲
by
gr3yh47
13y ago
he used a poor link for it, but that doesn't make it untrue - it is indeed true, their game is a blatant copy of candy swipe http://metro.co.uk/2014/02/13/candy-crush-saga-makers-to-sue...
272.
▲
by
gr3yh47
13y ago
(•_•) ( •_•)>⌐■-■ (⌐■_■) YYYYYEEEEEEAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH
273.
▲
by
gr3yh47
13y ago
it's not only overreach, it's obvious human rights abuse people have a right to not be indiscriminately surveilled by every country that they don't live in.
274.
▲
by
gr3yh47
13y ago
the sub-OS was my immediate thought when I saw it is an android device.
275.
▲
by
gr3yh47
13y ago
Yeah. crazy invasive and creepy was definitely my first reaction. I'm not a fan of the whole 'internet of things' to begin with, no thanks. My stuff doesn't need to track everything i do with it.
276.
▲
by
gr3yh47
13y ago
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Standard_written_English
277.
▲
by
gr3yh47
13y ago
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Standard_written_English ^^^ Read it for your own good
278.
▲
by
gr3yh47
13y ago
You are incorrectly equivocating informally acceptable with formally correct.
279.
▲
by
gr3yh47
13y ago
> There is no singular "them." exactly why it is incorrect to use in the singular. and this is the difference between formal and informal. there are rules that are widely accepted (formal) and then there are actual usages that
280.
▲
by
gr3yh47
13y ago
Actually, you're not getting it. While the use of 'them' and 'themselves' is increasingly acceptable informally, it still violates basic rules of plurality that most people agree upon, and is thus formally incorrect
281.
▲
by
gr3yh47
13y ago
When you know you're referring to a woman, sure. But when the gender is unclear, it shouldn't be a feminism issue. This entire argument has always seemed ridiculous to me, and I mean really, go look at the Spanish language...
282.
▲
by
gr3yh47
13y ago
among other reasons, having rules matters precisely to ENABLE the making of small mistakes while still preserving the whole idea being communicated. without the rules, the language has no meaning whatsoever.
283.
▲
by
gr3yh47
13y ago
"Themselves" is correct because it is plural. What of the singular?
284.
▲
by
gr3yh47
13y ago
I am not claiming that 'him' is a replacement for 'them' 'them' is plural and flatly incorrect when used as a singular pronoun. edit: Again, 'them' is formally incorrect but informally acceptable in t
285.
▲
by
gr3yh47
13y ago
Texting and using IM is bad advice. This is a personal preference at best and an absurdly overbroad and flatly incorrect statement at worst
286.
▲
by
gr3yh47
13y ago
This is, however, formally incorrect. "If a student has an inappropriate question, whatever you do, do not berate him." would be formally correct edit: and your corpus search correctly shows that the plural 'themselves'
287.
▲
by
gr3yh47
13y ago
Saying I can only make a claim if I have done a certain study is somewhat absurd, especially when you are, with that suggestion, claiming to be the authority on how to determine what is correct.
288.
▲
by
gr3yh47
13y ago
I don't think it's necessarily obvious or common knowledge today as it would have been maybe a decade or so ago. I also don't take for granted that the author of the post knows this since he doesn't mention this current
289.
▲
by
gr3yh47
13y ago
"himself" is the technically correct word for singular reflexive when the gender is unknown
290.
▲
Https://News.YCombinator.com/news still says the site is down
1 points
by
gr3yh47
13y ago
|
3 comments
291.
▲
by
gr3yh47
13y ago
none of that is required by the DMCA though
292.
▲
by
gr3yh47
13y ago
Couldn't this be used to watch peoples movements in a house from the street? In any case with the NSA's ubiquitous tracking and ability to compromise networked systems at will... this scares me and the privacy risks absolutely out
293.
▲
by
gr3yh47
13y ago
With all the revelations of built in weaknesses and such with existing encryption schemes... I don't know. I think we need a new one. That said, it should probably be developed by a panel of experts. I would love to see something by Br
294.
▲
by
gr3yh47
13y ago
Barring a jarring alteration of the existing trajectory, the US will soon have just as watered down free speech rights.
295.
▲
by
gr3yh47
13y ago
You state your view as though it's obvious, yet it is far more contrived of an explanation and is predicated on the idea that Nolan would change his mind about the ring and NOT fix it throughout, which seems so unlike him
296.
▲
by
gr3yh47
13y ago
I'm sorry, I've never used autocomplete for a few privacy related reasons, and this was one of them... this seems obvious, to the point where I thought the title was written in a sarcastic 'duh' tone... I figured not let
297.
▲
by
gr3yh47
13y ago
> If you don't download warez you don't need an antivirus this is just plain false with all the other attacks out there today. There are many methods of malware delivery which are easily accidentally triggered, even if you'
298.
▲
by
gr3yh47
13y ago
anyone know what the 2 tracks in the video are?
299.
▲
by
gr3yh47
13y ago
lavabit.com has a paypal donate link
300.
▲
by
gr3yh47
13y ago
He should contact the ACLU + EFF instead of asking for donations. But hey maybe the donations will help too
More ›