gpm

34 ms·

751.
by gpm 1y ago
The first chart does in fact a compelling reason to believe the effect is not that at all. If the "easy" code was predominantly being rewritten you would expect to % new memory unsafe code and % memory safety vulnerabilities to sc
752.
by gpm 1y ago
I feel like that's been a trend for the past decade at this point. I don't think this one is particularly egregious but it ain't great either. Could be your monitor as well.
753.
by gpm 1y ago
It says that there will exist a working set of hoops though. Which wasn't the plan before.
754.
by gpm 1y ago
Up to what a committee of 3 people (or in the alternate district court judge James Donato) believes this means, assuming the judge approves the proposed modification to the injunction in the first place > Google may create reasonable req
755.
by gpm 1y ago
Additional context per fediverse thread: The GPL code (i.e. kernel) was released on time, this is the AOSP userspace portions which Google isn't legally obligated to release (which doesn't make it not a dick move not to).
756.
by gpm 1y ago
No, there should be a shader (think video) rendered showing a bunch of tiny spinning things. Something went wrong when you tried to load the page. It's an optical illusion where only things close to the centre of your vision look like
757.
by gpm 1y ago
No, I was running on normal untrusted video files. The standard ffmpeg command line would happily attempt to parse those with the LucasArts Smush codec even though I'd never heard of it before. See the POC in the report by google, the
758.
by gpm 1y ago
Yes, but it was a public service not a service for the maintainers, and as a member of the public who like anyone who had run `ffmpeg -i <thing I downloaded from the internet>` was previously exposed to the vulnerability I highly ap
759.
by gpm 1y ago
> Just yesterday there was a story on here about how Google found [a security vulnerability that anyone running `ffmpeg -i <untrusted file> ...` was vulnerable to] in FFMPEG, and told [the world about it so that everyone could take
760.
by gpm 1y ago
See the "Empowering experienced users" section. They announced the $25 "verification" plan awhile ago. The new part in this article is that they're going to have it remain possible to install software that didn&#x27
761.
by gpm 1y ago
Apple says they are. The EU says they aren't. They're fighting over it.
762.
by gpm 1y ago
8 days ago Google and Epic announced a proposed settlement and modification of a permanent injunction that Epic won, I believe this proposed settlement would likely have prohibited Google's plan to forbid installation of third party ap
763.
by gpm 1y ago
Perhaps we should start with more local less violent events like hurricanes and volcanic eruptions.
764.
by gpm 1y ago
Reports of seeing the aurora right now across North America down to the US/Mexico border. If that describes you and you're not under cloud cover (like I unfortunately am) I'd recommend going outside and finding somewhere dark
765.
by gpm 1y ago
And 12% of the population for context.
766.
by gpm 1y ago
Minimally trained people pose no threat, this is why the US won against the Taliban...
767.
by gpm 1y ago
> The article speaks of this personnel like reservists, but could the training also apply to helping defend public infrastructure and institutions, where they work? (For example, if there ever be a need to quickly hand out firearms on-si
768.
by gpm 1y ago
Pretty sure NORAD sites are mostly far north of our population centres. That sentence was referring to the the other side of us the citizens not "us" the land Anyways, doesn't really matter if we're hit directly, we&#x27
769.
by gpm 1y ago
With the qualification that Canada has absolutely no intention of abandoning the West, merely the US. The intent of the government and people is absolutely to strengthen ties to western Europe, not weaken them.
770.
by gpm 1y ago
The difference here is presumably for the last hundred years, ending last November, there was simply no chance of a invasion of Canada. Nukes might fly overhead and end the world as they struck targets on either side, but other than that we
771.
by gpm 1y ago
The US has been consistently signalling that it is considering annexing us since Donald Trump was re-elected in November of last year... the politicians are unlikely to say it outright but I think this is pretty clearly aimed at the US and
772.
by gpm 1y ago
What I've done for the small handful of wifi connected devices I have is to have them connect to "internet sharing" from my laptop's wifi. Naturally when my laptop is using its wifi to create a hotspot it isn't actu
773.
by gpm 1y ago
Yeah, it is. Basically just up to your route planning... I feel like at more than 2 weeks people start going farther north but I think that has more to do with "we can" than there not still being good routes in Algonquin. I'd
774.
by gpm 1y ago
I'd recommend a long canoe trip in Algonquin park (or somewhere similar nearby if there is something similar nearby) if offline is your goal (though obviously not entirely similar to an ocean crossing in other ways as well).
775.
by gpm 1y ago
Crew requirements? And we can learn that technology has change in the last 150 years so those same requirements no longer exist. No ones suggesting building a sailing ship like they did 150 years ago. Just that the wind is still an interest
776.
by gpm 1y ago
No, I think they were pretty explicit > In our email dated 13 October 2025, we explained that Ofcom would be taking steps to monitor the voluntary block of users with UK IP addresses implemented by sanctionedsuicide.site and sanctioned-
777.
by gpm 1y ago
Sure... I think it's pretty much a given that Ofcom expects the US won't help them enforce this law given the 1st amendment. That doesn't mean they won't/shouldn't do their best to do so by themselves..
778.
by gpm 1y ago
> A some point, if you do not have any relationship with the UK, go as far as blocking its residents but they still want you to abide by their law Ofcom appears to agree that geoblocking UK residents would satisfy the requirements of thi
779.
by gpm 1y ago
It is a reply... that you chose to send despite being fully aware that by doing so you might be reaching out across borders because that's how the internet and your contracts with your service providers works. Governments can do whatev
780.
by gpm 1y ago
Mens rea usually means intent to do the thing, not intent to commit a crime. E.g. if I involuntarily swing my arm and hit someone in the face as a result of a medical condition I lacked the appropriate mens rea and am not guilty. If I inten

More ›