Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
gpm
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
40 ms
·
781.
▲
by
gpm
1y ago
What is having your web server send IP packets with an IP address addressed to an overseas address to your ISP who you have signed a contract with to have them deliver those packets to the designated address if not actively reaching across
782.
▲
by
gpm
1y ago
The real price of solar electricity is never negative. Unlike something like oil wells (which really have driven the price of oil negative) you can just turn solar off. Prices have gone negative because of things like subsidies - which in t
783.
▲
by
gpm
1y ago
So I'm a complete outsider, but they do not appear to be in the same position as the poster. They are marked as "Mozilla Staff" and "SUMO Administrator" (amongst many other things), neither of which the complainant
784.
▲
by
gpm
1y ago
Is it war crimes when there's no war? Would actually be curious to learn if the answer is yes. Naively it seems like old fashioned murder without any special qualifier. I guess it could be both too?
785.
▲
by
gpm
1y ago
True, license is probably irrelevant here because they aren't even intending to comply with the terms of it. To nitpick "explicitly forbidden" isn't quite right. Licenses basically only grant more permissions, they can&#
786.
▲
by
gpm
1y ago
Huh, if you click through their link the person responding is also a "sumo administrator" and it's "sumobot" causing the issues. It seems entirely likely they are personally directly responsible for it. Regardless t
787.
▲
by
gpm
1y ago
I don't think it's at all clear that some foss licenses (MIT for instance) are irrevocable. Not in the US, and certainly not in any possible relevant country... It's not clear that they are revocable either. As I understand
788.
▲
by
gpm
1y ago
Yes? If I bought a plane ticket to Costa Rica and it turned out half my fellow passengers were actually part of the xyz gang and hijacked it and flew it to... I don't know... El Salvador I would be entirely correct in calling them crim
789.
▲
by
gpm
1y ago
The proposed language of the injunction is here: https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.cand.36... I think but am not sure that part 13 actually does forbid Google's plan to forbid installing third
790.
▲
by
gpm
1y ago
Docket with link to the filings (See item 756, which should be at the top of your page): https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/17443962/epic-games-inc...
791.
▲
by
gpm
1y ago
And yet that was not the central in her run for mayor at all (I live in that city). She campaigned on policy, not on party branding, like every other candidate did.
792.
▲
by
gpm
1y ago
Canada here (Ontario really, probably varies by province) - our mayors and city councilors are politicians but they're explicitly forbidden from running as part of a party. Which I honestly think works so well it should be extended to
793.
▲
by
gpm
1y ago
Eh, ask the author to split it in reviewable blocks if you think there's a chance you actually want a version of the code. More likely if it's introducing tons of complexity to a conceptually simple service you just outright rej
794.
▲
by
gpm
1y ago
You're literally making the argument for why the problematic scenario the person you are responding to will occur. It costs nothing to waste the candidates time with this tool, so people will "turn down the dial" and do that.
795.
▲
by
gpm
1y ago
As a candidate I'm no more "done" evaluating the company after a first screening then the company is done evaluating me. As someone with the privilege to be able to reject job opportunities, it's all but certain running
796.
▲
by
gpm
1y ago
They are still going to interview if you choose to move forwards with this one sided time sink [1], and you pass. The first half of that criteria will filter out many of the good candidates. Which as yanyu says is a signal the company isn
797.
▲
by
gpm
1y ago
I think the intent is you watch the 20 minute conference talk at the top, not read the paywalled post.
798.
▲
by
gpm
1y ago
> particularly for applications willing to accept the extra burden of statically linking Fil-C-compiled dependencies. Best of both worlds! As near as I can tell Fil-C doesn't support this, or any other sort of FFI, at all. Nor am I
799.
▲
by
gpm
1y ago
The entire rust coreutils package, as installed, is 12 MB https://packages.ubuntu.com/questing/rust-coreutils Which is nearly double the gnu coreutils package but still a complete nothing burger: https://p
800.
▲
by
gpm
1y ago
The main python and perl toolchains were never maintained by GNU either. Python has never been distributed under a GPL license. I'm not 100% sure of the licensing history of perl but I think it's always been available under a non-
801.
▲
by
gpm
1y ago
Yeah, in... late 2012 https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/12/12/292
802.
▲
by
gpm
1y ago
I really like the idea of Fil-C for derisking legacy code, but - It's not an option for debian core infrastructure until it supports at least the same platforms debian does (arm, riscv, etc) and it currently only supports x86_64. - It
803.
▲
by
gpm
1y ago
Sandboxes are difficult independent of language, see all the recent speculation vulnerabilities for instance. Sure, worse languages make it even harder, but I think we're straying from the original topic of "python/ruby"
804.
▲
by
gpm
1y ago
It's hard to imagine their is some malicious financial incentive to choosing a different language to write the package manager with... The obvious potential motivations are things like making a more reliable product, or making their em
805.
▲
by
gpm
1y ago
Flagged for deliberately spreading disinformation under the name StopDisinfo. As this user is aware, rust has a specification https://github.com/rust-lang/fls , which they have previously commented on: https:/
806.
▲
by
gpm
1y ago
Are you counting ones that involve running malicious code in a sandbox and not just trusted code on untrusted input? Because then I'd agree, but that's a much harder and different problem. My impression is that for the trusted cod
807.
▲
by
gpm
1y ago
Not really. All (current) languages eventually have a compiler/runtime that is memory unsafe. This is basically fine because it's a tiny amount of surface area (relative to the amount of code that uses it) and it exists in a way t
808.
▲
by
gpm
1y ago
Appear drunk when you are sober, and sober when you are drunk - Sun Zoo
809.
▲
by
gpm
1y ago
If you prefer "real" names you can always look at the actual code that had a bug - here it is before the bug was fixed: https://github.com/oxidecomputer/omicron/blob/a253f541a4a32a...
810.
▲
by
gpm
1y ago
> So if a craft departs from rendezvous with another craft it must do so by pushing away from that other craft. More commonly we push away propellant, but pushing on the other craft is an option. > If the rendezvous was in orbit does
More ›