gonzalohm

4 ms·

1.
by gonzalohm 5d ago
Shouldn't there be a kid fee then? Kids are likely to cause damage and everyone is subsidizing it. It should just be common sense. You have a kid or you have a pet. They damaged the property, you pay it.
2.
by gonzalohm 5d ago
That's not the argument in the article. Not only that but coding is deterministic up to a certain point. Once the project becomes complex, it becomes harder and harder to account for all edge cases. Sometimes it requires heuristics tha
3.
by gonzalohm 5d ago
The article opens with > Writing requires thinking, don't let an AI do the thinking for you. And then the author goes on to admit that they use AI for coding. Does coding not require thinking or what? I agree that we shouldn't
4.
by gonzalohm 6d ago
I don't agree with that advice. Interviewing sucks. I know, if you currently have a job then you don't lose anything. Other than precious time and I already feel like I don't have enough free time, I don't want to invest
5.
by gonzalohm 7d ago
Not the same though. A lot of people are just too lazy to cancel. If Disney had to terminate all the subscriptions that would probably have prevented this type of behavior
6.
by gonzalohm 7d ago
Yeah, the "but this can be done in a day with AI" from management is going to get old soon
7.
by gonzalohm 8d ago
> Every company on earth is about to want one who can drive a fleet of agents with judgment Maybe seniors are seniors because they care about their work so they won't be using AI crap for serious projects
8.
by gonzalohm 9d ago
I think the main problem is a conflict of objectives. AI companies need you to use more tokens so they are not going to improve that. They are optimizing the models to get as close as possible to the point in which people would stop using t
9.
by gonzalohm 9d ago
I think that makes sense, but still, you would expect a hunter to know how to hunt. I'm talking about people losing their skills for the job they are supposed to be doing without gaining any new ones
10.
by gonzalohm 9d ago
Right, we are only interested in anything AI
11.
by gonzalohm 9d ago
Local as in the same economic area
12.
by gonzalohm 9d ago
Yeah that's a really good point. Good luck maintaining modern infrastructure without people that really understand it
13.
by gonzalohm 9d ago
That's an easy question. First, people will forget how to do anything and become highly dependent on AI. That's already happening. I already see people not able to finish their work without AI. Then, once everything has become a &
14.
by gonzalohm 9d ago
Or thinking
15.
by gonzalohm 10d ago
Why wouldn't you ask that? That's exactly why papers have supplementary material
16.
by gonzalohm 10d ago
But of all the possible available jobs and careers, you choose the one that you enjoy, right?
17.
by gonzalohm 11d ago
I think CGNAT is a type of residential proxy. Hidden from the user and provided by the ISP
18.
by gonzalohm 12d ago
That makes sense. The downside is that now if said CA has some interests in whether to re-issue a certificate or not, we have a problem. Imagine that Cloudfare decides you are a bot and doesn't allow you to visit pages. You are going t
19.
by gonzalohm 12d ago
You could also install a hypothetical bank certificate that way
20.
by gonzalohm 12d ago
You visit the bank in person and the bank gives you the keys in a flash drive, QR code, printed paper, ... Then you go home and install the keys
21.
by gonzalohm 12d ago
Agree on point 1. Now even tiny websites that wouldn't be a target for anyone are hiding behind Cloudfare. If you are so worried about people sending requests to your website then take it offline, that will get you 100% success prevent
22.
by gonzalohm 12d ago
I may speak from ignorance, but why do SSL certificates depend on centralized CA? If I'm an entity such as a bank, I should be able to sign my own certificate and provide the public keys to my clients which then can use it to both encr
23.
by gonzalohm 12d ago
The problem is not online banking. The problem is the banks we use. Accounting cash is extremely complicated and whether you like it or not, you will be forced to do an online transaction at some point. Are you going to be wiring money acro
24.
by gonzalohm 12d ago
One thing is doing it in a public forum and another is an enterprise product that you contracted poaching your own employees
25.
by gonzalohm 13d ago
That's a really weird argument. That's like saying that we shouldn't be afraid of radiation because it's just decaying atoms
26.
by gonzalohm 14d ago
At this point their products have so little material that it may be better for the environment to buy an IKEA one vs decent furniture (from the standpoint of caring for the environment)
27.
by gonzalohm 14d ago
I mean, they even recreated an IKEA inside a dungeon and you have to navigate it and get the part to build your Kallax
28.
by gonzalohm 15d ago
Do you know if there is a way of pointing any of the hackernews phone apps to your site instead of the official one?
29.
by gonzalohm 15d ago
Giving "git was built for open source projects but not all projects are open source" as a reason why they think git won't work in the future is pretty weird
30.
by gonzalohm 16d ago
You can lease it. We don't own the software on our phones, may as well not own the phone itself

More ›