Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
gloosx
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
12 ms
·
181.
▲
by
gloosx
1y ago
From a wider perspective it does vanish in terms of productive value: billions go into inflated transfers and club losses that generate little beyond spectacle, instead of going into things that improve lives (cheap energy, infrastructure,
182.
▲
by
gloosx
1y ago
Fair point, governments don't literally wire tax money straight to Qatar for oil. But whether it is at the pump or through subsidies, it is still ordinary people who end up carrying the cost — and that money gets recycled into football
183.
▲
by
gloosx
1y ago
Football is wild. Imagine countries and governments collect taxes. Then they use the taxes to buy petroleum products from Qatar. Then Qatar spends €262 millions on a single football player and gazillions on a European club, which is at €889
184.
▲
by
gloosx
1y ago
Tell me then does this kind of comment fits those guidelines or welcome here? >miroljub 3 hours ago | parent | next [–] > >We don't need such comments here. Is it kind? Is it curious? Thoughtful? Substantive?
185.
▲
by
gloosx
1y ago
Why do you speak for someone else? Those "We" are in the same room with us? The commenter above first couldn't understand, then read some comment, then understood something completely out-of-point throwing a bunch of generali
186.
▲
by
gloosx
1y ago
Life is a form of predictive processing, like LLMs try to mimic life by predicting the next word, brains are constantly predicting the state of the world itself. LLMs run on billions, gigawatts, and all of human knowledge to predict the nex
187.
▲
by
gloosx
1y ago
Your level of understanding is not very huge. React is an absolute pleasure to use, and we do enjoy it - that is why it became the most popular library and a revolution in web dev.
188.
▲
by
gloosx
1y ago
You do acknowledge this but this doesn't make the "spent 7 hours and shipped 35k LOC" claim factually correct or true. It sure sounds good but it's disingenuous, because shipping != making progress. Shipping code means d
189.
▲
by
gloosx
1y ago
It's strange that author is bragging that this 35K LOC was researched and implemented in 7 hours, but there are 40 commits spanning across 7 days. Was it 1 hour per day or what? Also quite funny that one of the latest commits is "
190.
▲
by
gloosx
1y ago
I don't think comparing it to something like camera surveillance inside your home is a good idea. You kind of own your home – if someone places camera in your property, you can just remove it / obstruct vision / sound etc.
191.
▲
by
gloosx
1y ago
It’s funny — Chat Control is not aimed at people who actually care about privacy. Those will always find a way to keep using encryption. The math doesn’t vanish because a law says so, and the open-source projects aren’t going away. What it
192.
▲
by
gloosx
1y ago
Obvious mousetrap. Imagine shovelling all this stuff at users for "free". I'm switching to my own Chrominium builds...
193.
▲
by
gloosx
1y ago
>This website has no class f12 -> ctrl+f -> "class" ><pre class="language-css">... NOOooooooo. They LIED to me. I officially state that this website HAS CLASS
194.
▲
by
gloosx
1y ago
I see what salesforce is doing here. Trying to force a sale.
195.
▲
by
gloosx
1y ago
If it's even true someone from outsourced support has access to some sensitive security details then using this dumpster is almost like throwing your money out of the window.
196.
▲
by
gloosx
1y ago
You know for thousands of years people are still stepping on rake, the spikey part. And they get hit in their foreheads. The rake is lever by design, but I wouldn't say the problem is the rake.
197.
▲
by
gloosx
1y ago
Nah, I started with vanilla, then jQuery, then finally learned React.
198.
▲
by
gloosx
1y ago
>But consider data modified This is why we never modify data but create new data. Data must be immutable. Strictly typed. Always in the form it is expected to be. Otherwise - crash immediatelly. >But later someone introduced This is w
199.
▲
by
gloosx
1y ago
Well, that is really embarrassing for Cloudflare... A recursion in a side-effect via dependencies is a rookie mistake, it's hard to imagine it could slip into production with a proper due process. Maybe they should stop vibe-coding and
200.
▲
by
gloosx
1y ago
Surely they are not normal JavaScript functions, but at least the syntax itself is not turned into a DSL like we see it in Svelte or Vue. That is the main difference.
201.
▲
by
gloosx
1y ago
JSX is just a syntax extension to JS, and it's not even required to create a React app. React "compiler" is in fact a transpiler, which is a very common thing in JS. >React is full of magic syntax that looks like functions
202.
▲
by
gloosx
1y ago
React isn’t just "winning by default" It's winning because at the core it's just JavaScript function composition. A component is a function, conditionals are `if (...) { ... } else { ... }`, loops are `map()`. JSX is jus
203.
▲
by
gloosx
1y ago
A man climbs the mountain to seek wisdom from the old sage. He bows and says: -- In October, Microsoft will force Microsoft 365 Copilot upon us all. The sage furrows his brow, strokes his beard, and replies: -- Tell me then... what the hell
204.
▲
by
gloosx
1y ago
That would indeed be pointless because I was originally replying to a single UI interaction, where it doesn't really make a huge impact whether it happened in 2 or 5 frames. You're trying to bring in continuous changing of frames
205.
▲
by
gloosx
1y ago
I would say when working with synths, the difference between 15ms and 2ms is just swing, it is noticeable but it doesn't feel wrong, just makes things more interesting. When a drummer plays drums all the hits are off-timing 10-40ms, an
206.
▲
by
gloosx
1y ago
Well, most of this sub 150ms lag everywhere in the interfaces is actually artificially designed, and believe it or not, some people do prefer it like this, so it's being designed like this. I'm personally for making everything as
207.
▲
by
gloosx
1y ago
The context was about UI interactions, not at all about movie clip which is a totally different thing.
208.
▲
by
gloosx
1y ago
Yeah of course it is different. My wording was not really correct here – I was rather meaning "irrelevant" in context of a user interface
209.
▲
by
gloosx
1y ago
20ms is faster than a fly reaction time, it's about the same time which 60HZ monitor takes to refresh the frame, 10 times faster than a typical human's reaction. Everything under 150 ms is pretty much indistinguishably fast to a n
210.
▲
by
gloosx
1y ago
Did you ask Microsoft permission to use logo/branding etc. Or are you ready to be sued?
More ›