4 ms·

Your level of understanding is not very huge. React is an absolute pleasure to use, and we do enjoy it - that is why it became the most popular library and a re

by gloosx 1y ago

Your level of understanding is not very huge. React is an absolute pleasure to use, and we do enjoy it - that is why it became the most popular library and a revolution in web dev.

miroljub 1y ago
> Your level of understanding is not very huge We don't need such comments here.
- gloosx 1y ago
  Why do you speak for someone else? Those "We" are in the same room with us? The commenter above first couldn't understand, then read some comment, then understood something completely out-of-point throwing a bunch of generalisms touching me like "people make themselves suffer" and "everyone else is just following" and decided to dump it here? I can't just leave it untouched since I have actual experience with React.
  - miroljub 1y ago
    "We" as the HN users, expect at least some level of civility when conversing here. It's right up there in the guidelines: https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html > Be kind. Don't be snarky. Converse curiously; don't cross-examine. Edit out swipes. > Comments should get more thoughtful and substantive, not less, as a topic gets more divisive. > When disagreeing, please reply to the argument instead of calling names. "That is idiotic; 1 + 1 is 2, not 3" can be shortened to "1 + 1 is 2, not 3." Try to argue without being personal.
    - gloosx 1y ago
      Tell me then does this kind of comment fits those guidelines or welcome here? >miroljub 3 hours ago | parent | next [–] > >We don't need such comments here. Is it kind? Is it curious? Thoughtful? Substantive?
      - OrderlyTiamat 1y ago
        In fact it contradicts guidelines, as they encourage downvoting without explanation in order to not clutter the thread. They were trying to explain to you, whereas most readers will sinply downvote. Yes, I think they meant that as a kindness.
  - brazukadev 1y ago
    Do you think people criticizing React do without experience? How naivy.

by gloosx 1y ago

Your level of understanding is not very huge. React is an absolute pleasure to use, and we do enjoy it - that is why it became the most popular library and a revolution in web dev.

miroljub 1y ago

> Your level of understanding is not very huge We don't need such comments here.

gloosx 1y ago
Why do you speak for someone else? Those "We" are in the same room with us? The commenter above first couldn't understand, then read some comment, then understood something completely out-of-point throwing a bunch of generalisms touching me like "people make themselves suffer" and "everyone else is just following" and decided to dump it here? I can't just leave it untouched since I have actual experience with React.
- miroljub 1y ago
  "We" as the HN users, expect at least some level of civility when conversing here. It's right up there in the guidelines: https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html > Be kind. Don't be snarky. Converse curiously; don't cross-examine. Edit out swipes. > Comments should get more thoughtful and substantive, not less, as a topic gets more divisive. > When disagreeing, please reply to the argument instead of calling names. "That is idiotic; 1 + 1 is 2, not 3" can be shortened to "1 + 1 is 2, not 3." Try to argue without being personal.
  - gloosx 1y ago
    Tell me then does this kind of comment fits those guidelines or welcome here? >miroljub 3 hours ago | parent | next [–] > >We don't need such comments here. Is it kind? Is it curious? Thoughtful? Substantive?
    - OrderlyTiamat 1y ago
      In fact it contradicts guidelines, as they encourage downvoting without explanation in order to not clutter the thread. They were trying to explain to you, whereas most readers will sinply downvote. Yes, I think they meant that as a kindness.
- brazukadev 1y ago
  Do you think people criticizing React do without experience? How naivy.