4 ms·
Why do you speak for someone else? Those "We" are in the same room with us? The commenter above first couldn't understand, then read some comment, then underst
by gloosx 1y ago
Why do you speak for someone else? Those "We" are in the same room with us?
The commenter above first couldn't understand, then read some comment, then understood something completely out-of-point throwing a bunch of generalisms touching me like "people make themselves suffer" and "everyone else is just following" and decided to dump it here? I can't just leave it untouched since I have actual experience with React.
- miroljub 1y ago"We" as the HN users, expect at least some level of civility when conversing here. It's right up there in the guidelines: https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html > Be kind. Don't be snarky. Converse curiously; don't cross-examine. Edit out swipes. > Comments should get more thoughtful and substantive, not less, as a topic gets more divisive. > When disagreeing, please reply to the argument instead of calling names. "That is idiotic; 1 + 1 is 2, not 3" can be shortened to "1 + 1 is 2, not 3." Try to argue without being personal.
- gloosx 1y agoTell me then does this kind of comment fits those guidelines or welcome here? >miroljub 3 hours ago | parent | next [–] > >We don't need such comments here. Is it kind? Is it curious? Thoughtful? Substantive?
- OrderlyTiamat 1y agoIn fact it contradicts guidelines, as they encourage downvoting without explanation in order to not clutter the thread. They were trying to explain to you, whereas most readers will sinply downvote. Yes, I think they meant that as a kindness.
- brazukadev 1y agoDo you think people criticizing React do without experience? How naivy.