gizmodo59

5 ms·

31.
by gizmodo59 3mo ago
I included Google along with Ant and OAI. OSS models have never been the highest performing model unless you refer to benchmaxxing.
32.
by gizmodo59 3mo ago
Yes. I’m 99% sure arc agi 3 will be saturated like 1 and 2. In less than a year. And they will come up with one more.
33.
by gizmodo59 3mo ago
None of the people signed this have ever produced a frontier model at a given date (Which is to say its neither Google/OAI/Ant). The ones that sign are meta, musk (who is in the shovel selling business as well), hugging face obvio
34.
by gizmodo59 3mo ago
what tool does someone recommend for claude and gemini? Its time to extract data from each!
35.
by gizmodo59 3mo ago
A lot of things are not black and white and it’s nuanced so someone with higher intelligence will point it out. It’s an emergent behavior not a defect
36.
by gizmodo59 3mo ago
MY cynical take: Until the compute needs get so enormous that only governments can fund it and there is a consensus internationally, its either company A in country X or company B in country Y. And since everyone thinks THEY are the good gu
37.
by gizmodo59 3mo ago
that looks exactly like the recent codex!
38.
by gizmodo59 3mo ago
ultra in codex is just a way to run multi agent system, pro is similar to other pro models like 5.5
39.
by gizmodo59 3mo ago
This number is obviously absurd but for other normal amount (say 2 million which can definitely happen with a mistake), can't they claim it in court that will bankrupt you even if your entire worth is just 100K for example?
40.
by gizmodo59 3mo ago
responses api provided many benefits over chat completions https://developers.openai.com/api/docs/guides/migrate-to-res... . Any reasoning model which is all the new models these days should use responses as p
41.
by gizmodo59 3mo ago
“ Eyes and brain alike evolved over millennia to process natural scenes, forests, rivers, coastlines, open skies. These environments share a specific mathematical pattern: their visual complexity decreases predictably as you zoom in on fine
42.
by gizmodo59 5mo ago
Anthropic is getting extremely petty and especially against oai - ad in superbowl about how they are the good guys. - dow public PR stunt (they are the ones to give Palantir their model access). - sues openclaw. - threatens every use of cc
43.
How to use codex to get the most out of it(jxnl.co)
5 points by gizmodo59 5mo ago|0 comments
44.
by gizmodo59 5mo ago
Inference is profitable. Companies lose money because: 1. Training is expensive. Not just compute but getting the data, researchers salaries etc 2. You have to keep producing new models to ensure people use your inference and there seems to
45.
by gizmodo59 5mo ago
where are all the claude fans who hate elon? Its very funny how ant will do anything at this point.
46.
by gizmodo59 5mo ago
The negative reactions here are baffling me. The fact that we can even get to say 30% with computer is amazing. So much hatred towards AI and anything from the frontier labs like OpenAI (or Goog for that matter) makes no sense.
47.
by gizmodo59 5mo ago
“I did not wake up to be a loser. This loser attitude, makes no sense to me.” - Frontier Model Labs (original quote by Jensen in a podcast)
48.
by gizmodo59 6mo ago
There is really no reason to use Claude code anymore. Codex is much better with gpt 5.5. Not to mention, it’s open source, they play well with third parties, they don’t hold the model like mythos for elite companies, they have other good mo
49.
by gizmodo59 6mo ago
Codex is becoming such a good product. I have the 100$ pro lite. I have Claude still but 20$. I rarely use it. Let’s see if they give generous limits and more importantly a model that’s better than 5.5. The mythos fear mongering did not giv
50.
by gizmodo59 6mo ago
Use the imagegen skill in codex and ask it to create sprites. It works really well.
51.
by gizmodo59 6mo ago
“Insider is supported by ANTHROPIC“ get their money and act like independent? What a joke
52.
by gizmodo59 6mo ago
While OpenAI was late to the game with codex, they are (inspite of the hate they get) consistent in model performance, limits, and model getting better along with harness (which is open source unlike Claude) and they don’t hype shit up like
53.
by gizmodo59 6mo ago
Gpt 5.4 high with fast mode in codex app is hands down the best way to do anything coding or non coding. If you have not tried it you are missing out. 100$ well spent. Claude code is too hyped up on HN.
54.
by gizmodo59 7mo ago
Unfortunately the paper doesn’t include gpt 5.3 which was released around the same time as opus 4.6 and also gpt 5.4 few days back. Both are available via api https://developers.openai.com/api/docs/models/gpt-
55.
by gizmodo59 7mo ago
ChatGPT has given more for my 20$ than any other vendor. And that’s not even considering codex which is so good and the limits are much much higher
56.
by gizmodo59 8mo ago
It’s disgusting how they have successfully fooled people into thinking they are the good guys. They partnered with palantir, let them freely do the dirty work and once they realized they can make money directly they spin the PR and just try
57.
by gizmodo59 8mo ago
They are playing a good PR game for sure. Their recent track record doesn’t show if they can be trusted. Few millions is nothing for their current revenue and saying they sacrificed is a big stretch here.
58.
by gizmodo59 8mo ago
5.1 is 100 years old in AI world.
59.
by gizmodo59 8mo ago
That’s their excuse to still appeal to people who can be tricked with their safety first pitch. It’s easy to have constitution and all the crap when you are not battle tested. They just showed their true colors.
60.
by gizmodo59 8mo ago
If you haven’t used codex with gpt-5.3-codex (high or xhigh) you are missing out. Claude is still good at conversations but boy I can have codex go at a problem and it does better than Claude almost all the time. Front end and product UX Cl

More ›