Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
gizmodo59
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
7 ms
·
61.
▲
by
gizmodo59
8mo ago
At this point if one lab comes up with a feature it’s a matter of time before another does the same!
62.
▲
by
gizmodo59
8mo ago
Codex 5.3 is hands down the best model for coding as of today
63.
▲
by
gizmodo59
8mo ago
That’s gpt-5.3-codex released last week
64.
▲
by
gizmodo59
8mo ago
It’s not a crime if you do something for money. Those who comment are likely doing the same and they couldn’t get into a company like OpenAI and hence the hatred! Keep doing the great work you always did! Excited to see what you ll do with
65.
▲
by
gizmodo59
8mo ago
Its SWE bench pro not swe bench verified. The verified benchmark has stagnated
66.
▲
by
gizmodo59
8mo ago
5.3 codex https://openai.com/index/introducing-gpt-5-3-codex/ crushes with a 77.3% in Terminal Bench. The shortest lived lead in less than 35 minutes. What a time to be alive!
67.
▲
by
gizmodo59
9mo ago
Codex seems to give compensation tokens whenever this happens! Hope Claude gives too.
68.
▲
by
gizmodo59
9mo ago
Nvda is not the only exception. Private big names are losing money but there are so many public companies seeing the time of their life. Power, materials, dram, storage to name a few. The demand is truly high. What we can argue about is if
69.
▲
by
gizmodo59
9mo ago
For every sensational article of AI was useless, there is plenty of examples where using ChatGPT to find out what else could be happening and then having a conversation with doctor has helped many that I know of anecdotally and many such re
70.
▲
by
gizmodo59
9mo ago
Not sure if this correct. Codex was one of the first research projects long before Anthropic was started as a company. May be they did not see it as a path to AGI. It seems like coding is seen by few companies as the path to general intelli
71.
▲
Poker Solver
(github.com)
1 points
by
gizmodo59
9mo ago
|
0 comments
72.
▲
by
gizmodo59
10mo ago
Only in HN and some reddit subs I even see the name claude. In many countries AI=ChatGPT.
73.
▲
by
gizmodo59
10mo ago
Yeah. 50% of the time to throw away expensive tokens and limits is not ideal. But I bet by this time next year OSS models will be at that capability!
74.
▲
by
gizmodo59
10mo ago
Is that your website or something? You keep promoting it
75.
▲
by
gizmodo59
10mo ago
With the amount of hatred for anything OpenAI it’s not surprising the author chose a clickbaity title. HNs quality of posts are going down and instead of objective analysis I often see very polarized and flamy articles, titles etc.
76.
▲
One Year with ChatGPT Pro as a First Hire
(soundformovement.com)
3 points
by
gizmodo59
11mo ago
|
0 comments
77.
▲
by
gizmodo59
11mo ago
I pay almost the same amount for youtube premium as chatgpt plus. And when I see the creators inserting their own sponsored ads I get frustrated. It stopped youtube's own ads but not the product placements and other ads by the creators
78.
▲
by
gizmodo59
11mo ago
Even as criticism targets major model providers, his inability to answer clearly about revenue & dismissing it as a future concern reveals a great deal about today's market. It's remarkable how effortlessly he, Mira, and other
79.
▲
by
gizmodo59
11mo ago
Anthropic emphasizes safety but their acceptance of Middle Eastern sovereign funding undermines claims of independence. Their safety-first image doesn’t fully hold up under scrutiny.
80.
▲
by
gizmodo59
11mo ago
While I don’t disagree that Google is the company you can’t bet against when it comes to AI, saying other companies are done is a stretch. If they have a significant moat then they should be at the top all the time by then which is not the
81.
▲
by
gizmodo59
11mo ago
It’s easy to appear as uncensored when the world’s attention is not on your product. Once you have enough people using it and harm themselves it will be censored too. In a weird way, this is helping grok to not get boggled by lawsuits unlik
82.
▲
by
gizmodo59
1y ago
I don’t agree that speed by itself is a big factor. It may target a certain audience but I don’t mind waiting for a correct output rather than too many turns with a faster model.
83.
▲
by
gizmodo59
1y ago
Not necessarily. I’m sure there is many cheaper android phones that are technically better in specs but many users won’t change. Once you are familiar, bought into the ecosystem getting rid of it is very hard. I’m lazy myself compared to ho
84.
▲
by
gizmodo59
1y ago
99% of the world doesn’t care a dime about oss. It’s all saas and what you host behind the saas is only a concern for enterprise (and not every enterprise). And openai or Anthropic can just stop training and host oss models as well.
85.
▲
by
gizmodo59
1y ago
Use --search option when you start codex
86.
▲
by
gizmodo59
1y ago
My take on long context for many frontier models is not about support but the accuracy drops drastically as you increase the context. Even if a model claims to support 10M context, reality is it doesn’t perform well when you saturate. Curio
87.
▲
by
gizmodo59
1y ago
Is this to help private shipping companies like FedEx and UPS? Sometimes you have to do something even if it’s expensive
88.
▲
by
gizmodo59
1y ago
Looks like OpenAI imagegen is still the SOTA?
89.
▲
by
gizmodo59
1y ago
Saying you’d donate to pets is one thing but saying it will never go to a human is so out of touch with the world. I’m sure you have great intentions but I just don’t see how you can take that approach.
90.
▲
by
gizmodo59
1y ago
Same! It has gotten a lot more expensive and even if I pay for premium, content creators show sponsored ads. I don’t know what I’m paying for.
More ›