givan

60 ms·

541.
Mysterious Rock Lines Found In Peru Predate Ancient Nazca Lines By Centuries(huffingtonpost.com)
2 points by givan 12y ago|0 comments
542.
2 billion-year-old African nuclear reactor(extremetech.com)
141 points by givan 12y ago|38 comments
543.
by givan 12y ago
The Citizen Hearing on Disclosure (April 29 - May 3, 2013) brought 40+ researchers and government/agency witnesses to Washington DC to testify before six former members of the U.S. Congress on events and evidence supporting the truth o
544.
The citizen hearing on disclosure (2013)(citizenhearing.org)
1 points by givan 12y ago|1 comments
545.
by givan 12y ago
Firebug is still unbeatable, chrome dev has a lot to catch up.
546.
Meerkats cheated by a clever bird(youtube.com)
1 points by givan 12y ago|0 comments
547.
Navy powers model plane using fuel made from sea water(youtube.com)
4 points by givan 13y ago|1 comments
548.
by givan 13y ago
Your analogy is false, you are comparing a real psychological disorder with Xenu fairytales or myths. I don't have the time anymore to explain in more detail why you are wrong, you simply want to argue without arguments and you are rig
549.
by givan 13y ago
All scientific theories require proof that comes from repeatable objective experimentation. Nut? If this conversation continues you would probably also call me a nazi, this is a classic for lack of arguments. I know, you don't need arg
550.
by givan 13y ago
Because you said so? You need arguments to sustain your claim. Science should prove or disprove some phenomena to be sure that is either true or false, otherwise there is still a probability, this is how it works. If you have a valid scient
551.
by givan 13y ago
It seems that you have trouble understanding what I said. Indeed there are no proofs but there are unexplained phenomena that deserve to be researched and if all people would be closed minded and rejected the possibility as silly then with
552.
by givan 13y ago
No it's not, as this must be proved scientifically to be real it must also be proved scientifically wrong to fully dismiss it, until then it's something unexplained. Our science lacks the knowledge or the tools to prove or disprov
553.
by givan 13y ago
You don't seem to understand the sociological impact that such a discovery can have on society to take it as an argument, if you think that things will continue as nothing happened and people will accept it as scientists, as something
554.
by givan 13y ago
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_E._Mack "I would never say, yes, there are aliens taking people. [But] I would say there is a compelling powerful phenomenon here that I can't account for in any other way, t
555.
by givan 13y ago
> There are explanations aplenty. I clicked on some links and some of them explain the phenomenon by presenting people that say all kind of conspiracies and are not credible, others have confused it with sleep paralysis and some others c
556.
by givan 13y ago
> Your need for a "real" explanation assumes there must be a physical reality behind the phenomenon. That doesn't have to be the case. But what can explain the phenonemen? Currently there is no explanation for this. You co
557.
by givan 13y ago
The funny thing is that I say the same things to a religious friend, how can you belive in all those stories without proof? I don't think we can compare the two but they are very similar from this point of view, lack of evidence. It&#x
558.
by givan 13y ago
It's true that 99.99% percent of reports are either hoaxes or misinterpretation of venus or human aircrafts and that here is a lot of misinformation. The only argument that I see is that there is no real explanation for the fact that m
559.
by givan 13y ago
So you reject the posibility with the argument that the space is big? the vastness of space says nothing about life density or travel capabilities of advanced civilations also we know so little about the structure of the universe. But I don
560.
by givan 13y ago
>Maybe they are afraid, closed minded or really belive we are alone in this vast universe I was trying to find an explanation for the immediate rejection of the subject as silly. > It exists inside people's minds. The strange thi
561.
by givan 13y ago
I agree that even if millions claim that have been abducted this is not solid proof but I think that the main reason for the lack of solid proofs is the impact of such proofs on the human society. Also this is subject is very taboo, most pe
562.
by givan 13y ago
Aliens are advanced and have cloacking ability, the only proof we have are stories from abductee hypnosis sessions. Professor Jacobs http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_M._Jacobs has researched the subject scientifical
563.
Satellite Images of Industrial Farms(wired.com)
2 points by givan 13y ago|0 comments
564.
An Egyptian relic has mysteriously started MOVING in a museum(thesun.co.uk)
4 points by givan 13y ago|3 comments
565.
Google Says It Can Predict Which Films Will Be Huge Box-Office Hits(businessinsider.com)
32 points by givan 13y ago|18 comments
566.
How To Actually Win A Fist Fight(joethepeacock.blogspot.ro)
3 points by givan 13y ago|3 comments
567.
Peeling Back the Ice of Antarctica(wired.com)
2 points by givan 13y ago|0 comments
568.
The Atacama Mystery(youtube.com)
3 points by givan 13y ago|0 comments
569.
by givan 13y ago
http://vimeo.com/24253126 ocean sky at night
570.
by givan 13y ago
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_religious_populations 92.35% of human population is religious, in every religion there are gods that can be easily associated with aliens. Looking at some religios beliefs the coming of gods means all

More ›