ggjkvcxddd

3 ms·

1.
by ggjkvcxddd 2y ago
Thanks for posting this. Suchir was a good dude. Nice, smart guy.
2.
by ggjkvcxddd 2y ago
Are we forgetting that this only happened because they got in huge trouble with regulators and had to withdraw their cars from the street for like a year? I wouldn't take their statement at complete face value and don't see any re
3.
by ggjkvcxddd 2y ago
The fact that this exact thing has received media coverage increases the likelihood that the post is fake. Of course the story remains plausible, and it certainly has an air of truthiness, but I'd give it very good odds for being fak
4.
by ggjkvcxddd 2y ago
It's ludicrous to lay this at the feet of individual employees and assert that they're all just lazy with no drive etc. Google has severe cultural problems and the responsibility for that should be assumed by the leadership.
5.
by ggjkvcxddd 2y ago
An AI that plays a fixed exploitative strategy will end up getting figured out relatively quickly and counter exploited pretty hard. This actually happens in real life sometimes when people attempt to deploy poker bots online. Any exploitat
6.
by ggjkvcxddd 2y ago
They're not mistaken. They're different programs for different tasks.
7.
by ggjkvcxddd 2y ago
That doesn't make sense. Of course it's a "single point of failure". I don't think anyone could have ever thought otherwise. A competing archive service would undoubtedly be great for humanity.
8.
by ggjkvcxddd 3y ago
ECHO CHESS Mar 21 (E) ♟ 2:26 sec 1/8 tries 14 moves Fun little logic puzzles for sure. Nice job! edit: HN stripped the emoji but I did solve it, lol
9.
by ggjkvcxddd 3y ago
There's a pretty vast gulf between "unwilling to answer innocent everyday questions" and "unwilling to produce child porn".
10.
by ggjkvcxddd 3y ago
>I just don't understand why people would use Chrome. Really? That seems hard to believe. I stuck with FF until around 2016 or so before being compelled to switch. The performance was just very clearly worse than Chrome's at th