getmeinrn

13 ms·

31.
by getmeinrn 3y ago
I can think of a scenario where someone might. Suppose you made it very easy for them to sign it over, with the contracts ready and someone in person ready to guide you through signing them. You could apply guilt and some made up scenario a
32.
by getmeinrn 3y ago
This is solvable by augmenting the database schema with comments. When you integrate your database with an LLM, you'll notice the LLM will produce flawed queries based on wrinkles in your database schema. This is because the LLM relies
33.
by getmeinrn 3y ago
It sounds like your concern is that an LLM is not capable of understanding an english explanation of the query and producing the correct query. I personally have not had many issues here, and the time saved by tweaking a generated query is
34.
by getmeinrn 3y ago
You send the produced query through a parser and a validator. The parser ensures it is syntactically correct, the validator ensures it is only accessing allowed data.
35.
by getmeinrn 3y ago
Yes! You can also instruct the LLM to constrain the generated statement with specific clauses, so that the notion of "my data" in the english query comes with implicit constraints. This can be made safe using a validation scheme,
36.
In California, your power bill will depend on your income(washingtonpost.com)
13 points by getmeinrn 3y ago|10 comments
37.
by getmeinrn 3y ago
Cool language! I wish there was more standard interpreter support though. Everyone seems to be using a different flavor, which yields different results depending on where the code runs.
38.
by getmeinrn 3y ago
They tend not to fail when religion is a pillar in the community. The Amish and Mennonites are great examples.
39.
by getmeinrn 3y ago
I just assume everything I do or say is recorded and stored forever on some redundant storage and can be easily searched if I'm ever notable enough to have influence. That shouldn't influence what you do or say though, because if
40.
by getmeinrn 3y ago
>If their cost in the cloud was about $1 per A100 hour, the training costs for this run alone would be about $63 million. If someone legitimate put together a crowd funding effort, I would donate a non-insignificant amount to train an op
41.
by getmeinrn 3y ago
Now let's talk about how this extrapolates to the rest of society.
42.
by getmeinrn 3y ago
>It’s not possible to extract verbatim text from it I didn't ask for the whole book, I asked for the first paragraph. It absolutely is possible to get verbatim text from chatgpt.
43.
by getmeinrn 3y ago
At one place I worked, I specifically asked in the interview if we would be on call. "Nope." Within 2 months of being hired, everyone on my team went on call, with no talk of compensation bumps. I was put in the awkward position o
44.
by getmeinrn 3y ago
You're missing the bigger picture[1]: Numerous questions of law or fact common to each Class arise from Defendants’ conduct: whether ChatGPT itself is an infringing derivative work based on Plaintiffs’ copyrighted books; wh
45.
by getmeinrn 3y ago
Yes, I acknowledged that piracy is illegal in my previous post. That's not what the lawsuit is about, according to The Verge: >In the OpenAI suit, the trio offers exhibits showing that when prompted, ChatGPT will summarize their boo
46.
by getmeinrn 3y ago
>then the use of that content downstream is tainted What does that mean exactly? That's why I used the "looking at a stolen painting" example. Sure, pirating materials is illegal. But I don't think that's the big
47.
by getmeinrn 3y ago
>You can’t use illegally acquired materials when doing business. This vague sentence conjures images of a company building products from stolen parts, but this situation seems different. IANAL, but if I looked at a stolen painting that n
48.
by getmeinrn 3y ago
You listed every other reason why someone would resist being policed about the word "whitelist", except the "you're being obnoxious" reason. In my experience, that's the far more common reason. Instead, you see
49.
by getmeinrn 3y ago
Wouldn't they first need to prove that OpenAI didn't ingest summaries of the book, and not the book itself?
50.
by getmeinrn 3y ago
A more convincing exhibit would have been convincing ChatGPT to output some of the text verbatim, instead of a summary. Here's what I got when I tried: I'm sorry for the inconvenience, but as of my knowledge cutoff in Septem
51.
by getmeinrn 3y ago
This reads like you enjoy antagonizing people, so I'm sure the feeling is mutual. Who would want to work with/for someone who enjoys agitating their peers or subordinates? Do you ask them their stance on abortion and free speech t
52.
by getmeinrn 3y ago
Have you ever considered that people don't like being told how to behave by unlikable people? And that language policing by definition makes you unlikable? When was the last time you told someone not to use a word and they said "y
53.
by getmeinrn 3y ago
I'm interested, can you share?
54.
by getmeinrn 3y ago
Who said everywhere did? The link is a table showing which states did which measures. It's meant for the people who try to suggest lockdowns never really happened because they didn't happen "everywhere."
55.
by getmeinrn 3y ago
You asked where, I showed you where. You're the only one talking about Wyoming here.
56.
by getmeinrn 3y ago
To those of you thinking of debating the above, remember, you cannot win the word game. The more you oppose someone telling you not to use a word, the more racist you appear, no matter the actual origins of the word in question. It simply d
57.
by getmeinrn 3y ago
A "stay at home order" is considered a lockdown, per wikipedia. If you disagree, take it up with the editors there. You will find them far more receptive than me. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/U.S._state_and_l
58.
by getmeinrn 3y ago
Why is that funny?
59.
by getmeinrn 3y ago
Don't regret it. People will play word games with you and move the goalposts, but we all lived through it. Don't get demoralized by people who have boundless energy for gaslighting.
60.
by getmeinrn 3y ago
>Two years into the pandemic, something shifted. That’s when I was getting inundated with people who were in crisis and on the brink of divorce. Yet another unintended consequence of lockdowns

More ›