Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
gedy
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
34 ms
·
691.
▲
by
gedy
2y ago
While I appreciate he put in a lot of work (thank you for the theme) - Material Design is someone else's work as well..
692.
▲
by
gedy
2y ago
Lol, I forgot all about that - though there were some cute chicks over there. I remember chatting with one about her upcoming French Toast test :-)
693.
▲
by
gedy
2y ago
Ah I got there 1/93 so may have missed. I remember going to "fundies", getting called "pinger", etc. Good times.
694.
▲
by
gedy
2y ago
Ha, at Lowry in 1993?
695.
▲
by
gedy
2y ago
I agree with you, but the issue afaik is that B-52 was more flexible whereas the B-70 was basically single purpose and basically obsoleted by ICBMs. B-52s were able to pivot to new roles so have stayed around. I'm humbled for us laughi
696.
▲
by
gedy
2y ago
Perhaps I'm misunderstanding something but your first link seems to show a solid lead by the conservative party?
697.
▲
by
gedy
2y ago
Yeah it's not partisan to wonder if it's a political move to maximize annoyance to point blame back at the current administration. Similar to teachers having to buy their own pencils etc but school administrators and their retirem
698.
▲
by
gedy
2y ago
> Your naive GraphQL API, on the other hand, will let me query large chunks of your database at a time No it won't, because it's not tied directly to the database and does not allow for arbitrary queries. Any of the "aha!&
699.
▲
by
gedy
2y ago
I think the OP is possibly confusing GraphQL with an ORM like Active Record. You are correct that you don't accidentally "expose" any more data than you do with REST or some other APIs. It's just a routing and payload
700.
▲
by
gedy
2y ago
This is a silly argument and sounds like a hot take from someone who's never used this. You could say the same about REST or whatever. It has nothing to do with "the database".
701.
▲
by
gedy
2y ago
Over 50 and yes I do. Especially when am WFH and can ignore office politics, posturing, and ladder climbing. As someone who is not a status-seeking individual, I don't need to "see and be seen", and it pays well.
702.
▲
by
gedy
2y ago
No when I say "schema" I mean the GraphQL structure, not your DB schema. The GraphQL structure can be totally independent from your DB if need be, and (GraphQL) queries on those types via API can resolve however you need and are d
703.
▲
by
gedy
2y ago
GraphQL is not arbitrary queries into your database! Folks need to really quit misunderstanding that. You can define any schema and relations you want, it's not an ORM.
704.
▲
by
gedy
2y ago
If not clear from headline, this means the much cheaper compounded semiglutide won't be available soon. I just got approved for semiglutide this morning (not covered by insurance), and wow the price difference between compounded and br
705.
▲
by
gedy
2y ago
Makes sense, though if the OP says he's tired of startups and wanting a "normal job", might have make some tradeoffs in the perfect role.
706.
▲
by
gedy
2y ago
> I couldn't tell if it wasn't a fit or if I just sucked. It's just an abnormally bad market right now and companies are passing on good candidates left and right. I highly doubt it's all you.
707.
▲
by
gedy
2y ago
> pure IC roles just make me dread working at this point Thanks for info, is this part of your challenge? You stated you want a normal job and tech salary, but is it that you really don't want or enjoy coding? In either case, I
708.
▲
by
gedy
2y ago
You would be fine with some looking assuming you have common tech stack experience, also do you have a technical degree? In either case the leet code nonsense is probably unavoidable so worth some time as well. Have you tried who's hir
709.
▲
by
gedy
2y ago
> WTF is this hobby coding bullshit expectations? I can empathize with your position if you are also against expecting candidates "prepare for the interview" by leet code grinding or "brush up on CS concepts". Hobby c
710.
▲
by
gedy
2y ago
> So we test on a more relevant job skill, like can you have a real conversation (with a whiteboard to help) about how to solve the problem. Everybody says that, but reality is they don't imho. If you don't pass the pet questi
711.
▲
by
gedy
2y ago
Funny note about that is there is still an old fish and chips place in town there that was opened to cater to the Brits (Alphie's)
712.
▲
by
gedy
2y ago
Not at all, as keep in mind they pack up a (random) operational ICBM and crew from Wyoming, South Dakota or wherever and transport it to Vandenberg SFB in California to test launch it from there.
713.
▲
by
gedy
2y ago
I think that's fine, have seen this published publicly before. A major part of the test is the operational testing, so the crews who actually do the test fire treat it exactly like they would in the field, and are isolated from the mo
714.
▲
by
gedy
2y ago
Not my post but used to work on these test launches years ago. I can answer some not-classified questions.
715.
▲
by
gedy
2y ago
These mostly end up in the Kwajalein Atoll lagoon, and they are quite monitored, lol.
716.
▲
by
gedy
2y ago
They've been testing launching these since the 60s, and they are honestly quite reliable given their complexity
717.
▲
by
gedy
2y ago
Lovely use of technology! Modern day analogy of old time turntable mixing
718.
▲
by
gedy
2y ago
As someone who did Java WebApps for 10 years - they sucked if you cared about making a good user interface. I thought JS was bad at the time, but node.js was a breath of fresh air for API development, and client side JS has been fine for li
719.
▲
by
gedy
2y ago
I guess I'm unlucky, though the companies were full of young people which might be a factor
720.
▲
by
gedy
2y ago
> people are distracted during meetings It feels like he's just old and pining for days gone by - in person meetings have people staring at their laptops and phones too. I dislike that as well, but that's not a WFH issue.
More ›