gebruikersnaam

8 ms·

31.
by gebruikersnaam 5y ago
In addition to this: traditional media organizations provide a training space for new writers, journalists etc. You can argue that that strengthens the status quo, but Substack provides nothing to promote new talent.
32.
by gebruikersnaam 5y ago
> Where can I read about that classification for this polling data? I see that you get your talking points from Mate. But the fact that he or you don't have access to classified info doesn't mean you get to decide that the data
33.
by gebruikersnaam 5y ago
> I think What you think is irrelevant, US intelligence classifies the data as sensitive. The fact is that Manafort lied about sharing the data with Kilimnik, that Barr tried to keep it a secret. But lets see what the Senate report actua
34.
by gebruikersnaam 5y ago
"Mueller: A president can be charged with obstruction of justice after leaving office" [1] Statements that Congress could have impeached Trump can only be viewed as stated in bad faith. Congress did impeach Trump, but for politica
35.
by gebruikersnaam 5y ago
Interesting that you comment on the part from the Treasury Department, and not the WP piece. The latter references the Senate committee, stating that Kilimnik received highly sensitive campaign data and designated him as a Russian agent. If
36.
by gebruikersnaam 5y ago
Treasury: Manafort associate passed 'sensitive' campaign data to Russian intelligence [1] The government finally connects the line from Trump’s campaign to Russian intelligence [2] [1] https://thehill.com/policy&#x
37.
by gebruikersnaam 5y ago
The NY Post isn't a credible source, sorry. If Pompeo had evidence of Kerry having illegal talks, he had the opportunity to provide this evidence to the FBI, seeing as he was part of the administration at the time. Instead he chose to
38.
by gebruikersnaam 5y ago
Only if he pretended to represent the US administration. Did he do that? Otherwise it's just a private citizen meeting with foreign diplomats, which happens all the time and there's nothing nefarious about that.
39.
by gebruikersnaam 5y ago
> there was "ample evidence" for it Funny you don't mention the Senate committee (led by Republicans) which found the same evidence.
40.
by gebruikersnaam 5y ago
The Mueller investigation didn't find hard proof that Trump et al. conspired with Russia because there was plenty of perjury and obstruction. When a investigation is limited by politics and vague policies, you can't blame the inve
41.
by gebruikersnaam 6y ago
Harbor tugs are more commonly equipped with these: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Voith_Schneider_Propeller They're quite efficient (although maybe only for lower speeds) and provide extreme maneuverability.
42.
by gebruikersnaam 6y ago
AZ admits they shared old data: https://news.yahoo.com/astrazeneca-share-latest-data-panel-1...
43.
by gebruikersnaam 6y ago
This seems to be false: https://www.reuters.com/article/idUSKBN2BA1CF
44.
by gebruikersnaam 6y ago
It seems they are starting legal actions: https://www.reuters.com/article/idUSKBN2BA1CF
45.
by gebruikersnaam 6y ago
This still doesn't provide an explanation for shipments to Australia, other than for higher profits. Which he explicitly denied doing so.
46.
by gebruikersnaam 6y ago
No, there are plenty of articles from which you deduced there was a contract signed by the UK before august. It's impossible to prove there wasn't a contract signed, it is however possible to prove a contract was signed. Your arti
47.
by gebruikersnaam 6y ago
If they are actually selling at cost [citation needed], why would they ship to Australia with undoubtedly higher transport costs?
48.
by gebruikersnaam 6y ago
Your article from may doesn't say anything about signing contracts, only that they are ready to go. I've seen the articles mention may, june and august as signing dates of the contract, so clearly there is some 'miscommunicat
49.
by gebruikersnaam 6y ago
One is from independent researchers, the other one is from AZ press persons.Take your pick.
50.
by gebruikersnaam 6y ago
Your link doesn't say anything about signing contracts. And press releases saying they are ready to go don't count as signing contracts. All your links are rooted in AZ press releases, which means nothing.
51.
by gebruikersnaam 6y ago
"He also denied suggestions that AstraZeneca might be selling vaccine doses manufactured in the EU to other parts of the world in order to make a bigger profit."
52.
by gebruikersnaam 6y ago
Again: Soriot is lying. This link says the UK signed in june : https://www.researchprofessionalnews.com/rr-news-europe-inno... Except it didn't, the UK signed in august. The link also says they wouldn't export EU
53.
by gebruikersnaam 6y ago
This link says that the contract are comparable: https://www.thelondoneconomic.com/news/astrazeneca-signed-va...
54.
by gebruikersnaam 6y ago
AZ is lying: Here the boss is telling the UK signed in june : https://www.researchprofessionalnews.com/rr-news-europe-inno... Except it didn't, the UK signed on august 28th, 1 day after the EU (per your link). In the i
55.
by gebruikersnaam 6y ago
https://www.thelondoneconomic.com/news/astrazeneca-signed-va...
56.
by gebruikersnaam 6y ago
They signed 1 dey before the UK, which also got a 'best effort' contract.
57.
by gebruikersnaam 6y ago
This is not true, the contract for EU and UK are largely the same. The EU even signed 1 day earlier. This is FUD originating from AZ, which are downright lying.
58.
by gebruikersnaam 6y ago
See my other comment, the author says the change didn't involve the black developer community. I have no knowledge either way, just emphasizing their point.
59.
by gebruikersnaam 6y ago
From the article: "So if this change did not really even attempt to involve the black developer community..."
60.
by gebruikersnaam 6y ago
> Since the author doesn't find the language offensive You're missing the point, the author concludes that the companies decide that the language is offensive without asking the people who are supposedly the offended party.

More ›