3 ms·
Your link doesn't say anything about signing contracts. And press releases saying they are ready to go don't count as signing contracts. All your links are ro
by gebruikersnaam 6y ago
Your link doesn't say anything about signing contracts.
And press releases saying they are ready to go don't count as signing contracts.
All your links are rooted in AZ press releases, which means nothing.
- readittwice 6y agoThat article was clearly published in May 2020, I don't assume AZ sneaked that article in. Are you really saying that AZ was faking the press release in May 2020, so that in 2021 they could claim that the UK signed the contract three months before the EU?
- gebruikersnaam 6y agoYour article from may doesn't say anything about signing contracts, only that they are ready to go. I've seen the articles mention may, june and august as signing dates of the contract, so clearly there is some 'miscommunication'. And both the may and june date originates from AZ, while the actual date turns out to be august.
- readittwice 6y agoThere are plenty of articles from May 2020 that all discuss in various words that a deal was struck. If you believe that AZ didn't sign a contract with the UK before Aug 28 then the burden is on you to prove that.
- gebruikersnaam 6y agoNo, there are plenty of articles from which you deduced there was a contract signed by the UK before august. It's impossible to prove there wasn't a contract signed, it is however possible to prove a contract was signed. Your articles never provided evidence for the date the contract was signed.