Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
gd1
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
16 ms
·
31.
▲
by
gd1
10y ago
It is very sad that they won't open up, and very short-sighted as well. I'm sure Whitney and KX are perfectly happy with their millions, but they are sitting on one of the most impressive software achievements around and refusing
32.
▲
by
gd1
10y ago
That's a theory buddy. The word "speculated" might clue you in. Maybe that is the case. It is plausible. Maybe he is 'craving for attention and coming up with stunts'. Also plausible. Unless you're a fuckin
33.
▲
by
gd1
10y ago
So that is evidence that the light is motivating the octopus is it?
34.
▲
by
gd1
10y ago
There is no more evidence for your theory than theirs. Neither can be proven. So "let's not attribute any aspect of his behaviour" to anything is the only correct response.
35.
▲
by
gd1
11y ago
In the UK where you are from, the top marginal rate is 13.8% employer NI (make no mistake, that money comes out of your pocket), 2% employee NI, and 45% income tax. Grand total = 60.8%. So you're not far off.
36.
▲
by
gd1
11y ago
It's not O(k) then. As he mentioned, he's writing this as a language feature, so he can't make simplifying assumptions about k or n. It must handle large n, and can't assume k << n.
37.
▲
by
gd1
11y ago
Sure, it's simple. Don't allow heretics (Galileo, Spinoza) Don't allow homosexuals (Turing) Don't allow Communists (Hollywood Ten) You're basically assuming that your moral code (that you happen to share with the ma
38.
▲
by
gd1
11y ago
That was a good read. It's no GTA San Andreas streaming deer cam, but not bad.
39.
▲
by
gd1
11y ago
There's been a deluge of anti-cash articles post Davos, and it's no mystery as to why. Not because it helps to prevent crime, or is more convenient, or any of these other reasons. Simply because you can't implement negative
40.
▲
by
gd1
11y ago
Nearly every F1 team is located in Southern England. Williams is in Wantage, Mclaren in Dorking. Exotic materials, wind tunnels, FE clusters, CAD/CAE engineering talent, etc...
41.
▲
by
gd1
11y ago
>They aren't outbidding the markets, they are front running by seeing an order, buying it, and then selling it to the original buyer. Please step me through this scenario. Exactly what do you think is happening, in what order and h
42.
▲
by
gd1
11y ago
I've found it interesting to read and evaluate some viewpoints that I don't normally hear. Please stop demanding that HN be your own personal echo chamber.
43.
▲
by
gd1
11y ago
Can you at least tell your opponent that they have played double plus ungood?
44.
▲
by
gd1
11y ago
You mean to say this Abhimanyu Ghoshal doesn't actually speak for 1 billion Indians? You must be offended that he presumed to know your opinion, based on your nationality, without asking you.
45.
▲
by
gd1
11y ago
>So who are these experts in HFT that should be referenced? Certainly not me or Michael Lewis. >One source I like to follow is Eric Hunsader. Well done. I nearly spat my coffee. Are you trying to be funny? I can't tell.
46.
▲
by
gd1
11y ago
You can try this in court one day. "Well, there were only 100 million people in Roman times, and there are like 6 billion people now, so on a relative scale, so me brutally murdering someone is an order of magnitude less serious. Tha
47.
▲
by
gd1
11y ago
"The Empire’s accidental harming of Luke’s Aunt Beru and Uncle Owen can be directly compared to the casualties of President Obama’s drone campaign, whose body count terrorists capitalize upon for recruitment." Uh-huh. And I suppo
48.
▲
by
gd1
11y ago
1. F=ma, Newton's second law, can be replicated easily. It's a fact. 2. If I kick this soccer ball right here, applying a force, it will accelerate away from me. It's a fact. 3. Look, it has accelerated away from me, it
49.
▲
by
gd1
11y ago
KDB is simplicity itself. It doesn't get much more elegant.
50.
▲
by
gd1
11y ago
I will have one last go at explaining my position, as simply as I can. I used the word 'unchanged' to indicate that the sea level in the Marshall Islands is unchanged. It is currently approximately where it was 23 years ago. Thi
51.
▲
by
gd1
11y ago
>I agree with you that the current sea level is about where it was 23 years ago. So you'd agree that it is, um, how should I phrase this... unchanged?? Why then did you explicitly call me out, and call me a crackpot, for not defendi
52.
▲
by
gd1
11y ago
By the way, you will note in my initial source that the final point in the dataset is level with the initial point (slightly below). So it is, in fact, unchanged. You can quibble about smoothing methods, how to fit a regression, etc., but
53.
▲
by
gd1
11y ago
'Crackpot' is a several thousand word article on how climate change is submerging the Marshall Islands when all the hard data shows that sea level has done fuck all except bounce around for 23 years. But sure, yeah, I'm a cra
54.
▲
by
gd1
11y ago
Wow. I see - at best - a random walk. A random walk where the noise is about 5 times the amplitude of any signal you might argue is there. I also see the mean tailing off the last three years to be lower than it was in '93. What do
55.
▲
by
gd1
11y ago
We'll try the BOM then, that goes back to '93: http://www.bom.gov.au/ntc/IDO70052/IDO70052SLI.shtml Try any source you like. Show me something hard to back up "The Marshall Islands are Disappearing
56.
▲
by
gd1
11y ago
The article claims that it has increased by a foot, which is 30 centimeters: " Changing global trade winds have raised sea levels in the South Pacific about a foot over the past 30 years" What smoothing do you recommend I apply, s
57.
▲
by
gd1
11y ago
Australian BOM: http://www.bom.gov.au/ntc/IDO70052/IDO70052SLI.shtml "Changing global trade winds have raised sea levels in the South Pacific about a foot over the past 30 years" No.
58.
▲
by
gd1
11y ago
Marshall Islands sea level, unchanged for 20 years: http://sealevel.colorado.edu/content/interactive-sea-level-t... No one denies the science more than alarmists.
59.
▲
by
gd1
11y ago
These integrated omnipath fabric ports... are they going to be competitive with low latency NICs like those provided by SolarFlare/Mellanox ?
60.
▲
by
gd1
11y ago
What's genuinely embarrassing is that you think there is enough ice on the planet to raise sea levels 150m.
More ›