4 ms·
There is no more evidence for your theory than theirs. Neither can be proven. So "let's not attribute any aspect of his behaviour" to anything is the only cor
by gd1 10y ago
There is no more evidence for your theory than theirs. Neither can be proven. So "let's not attribute any aspect of his behaviour" to anything is the only correct response.
- Joof 10y ago> It was speculated that the light was disrupting its nocturnal routine. That seems to support the previous posters theory.
- gd1 10y agoThat's a theory buddy. The word "speculated" might clue you in. Maybe that is the case. It is plausible. Maybe he is 'craving for attention and coming up with stunts'. Also plausible. Unless you're a fucking octopus mind reader, you can't say for sure. We have no evidence either way. Which is what I am trying to explain to developer2, who seems to think he can attribute the octopus' behaviour to the "crippling reality of captivity". He can't. And in fact, humans are notoriously bad at doing this with animal psychology, we tend to anthropomorphize them.
- coldtea 10y agoNo evidence? You do know that light plays a significant role in circadian rhythms in most animals and can have dire effects on physiology, right?
- gd1 10y agoSo that is evidence that the light is motivating the octopus is it?