Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
gatinsama
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
6 ms
·
1.
▲
Programming versus Writing with LLMs. Different Beasts
(hexaray.com)
2 points
by
gatinsama
3mo ago
|
0 comments
2.
▲
Start Small: The key to successful software projects
(keystonebit.com)
2 points
by
gatinsama
4mo ago
|
0 comments
3.
▲
AI creates jobs. Simplicity destroys jobs
(hexaray.com)
1 points
by
gatinsama
6mo ago
|
0 comments
4.
▲
Why Write in the Time of LLMs?
(hexaray.com)
2 points
by
gatinsama
7mo ago
|
0 comments
5.
▲
by
gatinsama
8mo ago
Yes, because of AI. Have you watched it?
6.
▲
by
gatinsama
8mo ago
Catch 22: - Attackers can copy: no moat, no value. - Attackers can't copy: AI is not so valuable after all.
7.
▲
Pursuit of Wonder -YouTube- face reveal (because of AI) [video]
(youtube.com)
1 points
by
gatinsama
8mo ago
|
2 comments
8.
▲
Show HN: MakeWay is a simple async client portal
(getmakeway.com)
1 points
by
gatinsama
8mo ago
|
0 comments
9.
▲
by
gatinsama
10mo ago
This is a famous one: https://www.contexte.com/eu/
10.
▲
by
gatinsama
1y ago
I think you mean this one: Where's the shovelware? Why AI coding claims don't add up https://mikelovesrobots.substack.com/p/wheres-the-shovelware... https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=451205
11.
▲
Inline Notes, an Alternative to Footnotes
(keystonebit.com)
2 points
by
gatinsama
1y ago
|
1 comments
12.
▲
by
gatinsama
1y ago
CEOs know (or don't care) that they won't reach superintelligence. The reason they are where they are is that they are good at saying what they need to get the next round of funding.
13.
▲
by
gatinsama
1y ago
Exactly this. Everyone else is doing what everyone else does. There's no direct relationship between AI adoption and layoffs, except for inflated board/CEO expectations.
14.
▲
by
gatinsama
1y ago
I don't agree with the take. Computer abstractions should take cues from the real world that we are more familiar with, where objects have properties that we can infer in the digital world, like moving, copying, etc. This makes it easi
15.
▲
Steve Jobs, the Xerox Alto, and computer typography
(righto.com)
3 points
by
gatinsama
1y ago
|
0 comments
16.
▲
Who cares about developer productivity anyway?
(keystonebit.com)
3 points
by
gatinsama
1y ago
|
0 comments
17.
▲
by
gatinsama
1y ago
It's always DNS
18.
▲
by
gatinsama
1y ago
"Namespaces are one honking great idea -- let's do more of those!" Zen of Python
19.
▲
by
gatinsama
1y ago
It's AI. 100%
20.
▲
by
gatinsama
1y ago
Counterpoint: I am not bored at all. Hyped as it is, it is important to be here to discuss its uses, misuses and implications. Some if it is fascinating, and other parts are fascinatingly bad. I understand the fatigue with it. But that it i
21.
▲
by
gatinsama
2y ago
It is a huge turnoff for me when futuristic series use conversational interfaces. It happened in the Expanse and was hard to watch. For anyone who likes to think, learn, and tinker with user interfaces (HCI in general), it's obviously
22.
▲
by
gatinsama
2y ago
You can't delegate understanding. I don't mean you shouldn't, you can't. If you don't understand what's happening, you have no way to know if the system is working as intended. And understanding (and deciding)
23.
▲
Software Producers. Building digital systems is more than writing code
(keystonebit.com)
1 points
by
gatinsama
2y ago
|
0 comments
24.
▲
by
gatinsama
2y ago
The premise is flawed. What makes companies valuable is not having engineers with the ability to write good code. Also > Alas. Because, and I cannot stress this enough, I am not an engineer. And then... > Though it’s hard to benchmark
25.
▲
by
gatinsama
2y ago
Yes, but it's way more on the can't fizzbuzz side. Our view is skewed because of the people we work with. If you have an extreme Pareto distribution, talking about "normal" is not helpful.
26.
▲
by
gatinsama
2y ago
There are no "normal" engineers. There are many terrible developers who can't fizzbuzz, a bunch of decent programmers, and a few software engineers who understand what they are doing. And then... the 100xers like Linus. It&#
27.
▲
by
gatinsama
2y ago
The problem with Google is that their ad business brings so much revenue that no other product makes sense. They will use whatever they learn with robots to raise their ad revenue, somehow.
28.
▲
by
gatinsama
2y ago
Here: https://newsletter.pragmaticengineer.com/p/ai-tools-for-soft...
29.
▲
by
gatinsama
2y ago
I heard a programmer I respect a lot say: "It's difficult to quantify this, but my guess for a while has been that I've had a giant productivity boost in the portion of my job which is typing code at a computer. And I would e
30.
▲
How much are LLMs boosting real-world programmer productivity?
(lesswrong.com)
110 points
by
gatinsama
2y ago
|
97 comments
More ›