gasull

40 ms·

481.
by gasull 13y ago
FTA: The use of the phrase ‘if deemed necessary,’ sounds like it was some kind of official organization that was doing the planning.” In other words, the “identified [DELETED” mentioned in the Houston FBI document may have been some other
482.
by gasull 13y ago
I've done some research before upvoting this. I thought whowhatwhy.com would be some kind of conspiracy site, but they just do investigative journalism. They are usually featured in Salon.com. http://www.salon.com/top
483.
by gasull 13y ago
You can also look at recent history and see the progression in the last 10 years. Although I believe you're right nobody will shoot you in the head tomorrow , we don't know how worse this is going to get in the next 10 or 20 year
484.
by gasull 13y ago
> * What the IRS did to Tea Party groups is probably just the tip of a very large iceberg.* And the FBI cracked down on Occupy: http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2012/dec/29/fbi-coor...
485.
by gasull 13y ago
This is so great. This is the only thing that has made me feel some hope since all of this started. Thank you!
486.
Mastercard and Visa start banning VPN providers(torrentfreak.com)
25 points by gasull 13y ago|3 comments
487.
by gasull 13y ago
https://wikileaks.org/wiki/Category:Russia https://wikileaks.org/wiki/Category:China
488.
by gasull 13y ago
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Doublespeak
489.
by gasull 13y ago
Worth mentioning that the author smeared WikiLeaks in the past: https://twitter.com/wikileaks/status/351121777742716928
490.
by gasull 13y ago
> open source, P2P, optionally server-backed, encrypted Dropbox I believe you can get 80% there with git-annex or DVCS-autosync and a git repo in Tor. I believe there is a free but limited git repo hosting in Tor, but don't take
491.
by gasull 13y ago
It uses I2P: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/I2P So your phone number or real world identity isn't linked to an identity on NightWeb necessarily, and even when you use your real name, everything is encrypted and dis
492.
by gasull 13y ago
It's pseudonymous/anonymous, but more important, it's encrypted and distributed.
493.
by gasull 13y ago
Related: Revealed: how the FBI coordinated the crackdown on Occupy http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2012/dec/29/fbi-coor...
494.
by gasull 13y ago
Why are CIA agents being embedded with NYPD? That's the main question. If they had limits or not is secondary.
495.
by gasull 13y ago
Despite that I agree and that I think that Assange and Snowden didn't have a better course of action than asking for asylum, I still think it's good to expose dirty things that the Ecuadorian Government is doing. This is the first
496.
by gasull 13y ago
In some Communist states you didn't own your home or even your car. To be fair, many Communists don't consider those states real communism. This is analogous to Libertarians rejecting state-run crony capitalism.
497.
by gasull 13y ago
FTA: > Are there any places left on earth that actually do respect basic civil liberties? I would really like to know the answer.
498.
by gasull 13y ago
Or how long until they expand to other departments?
499.
by gasull 13y ago
I don't know what kind of communism the OP refers to, but some kinds of communism defend the idea of personal property but are against private property . Although I agree: How does joining a Communist or Anarchist group help? We ne
500.
by gasull 13y ago
The headline should be "Obama says he refuses to barter over Snowden". And every time a politician says something, that's just PR. What matters is what politicians do .
501.
by gasull 13y ago
I don't think there is any security damage, no matter what they claim. There is embarrassment because of the wrongdoing being revealed.
502.
by gasull 13y ago
How do we know that there isn't another super secretive program, right now, that is still collecting everything? How can we trust the Government, ever in the future, to tell the truth? I don't see how this can actually be solved,
503.
by gasull 13y ago
Good. The focus should be on the revelations.
504.
by gasull 13y ago
Likely, but we don't know for sure.
505.
by gasull 13y ago
I can't help thinking that the headline is more a suggestion than a question.
506.
by gasull 13y ago
Related talk at the last HOPE conference: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Az7txN0599M
507.
by gasull 13y ago
RequestPolicy suffers of the same problem as NoScript with default settings: it blocks everything and you have to waste time configuring what JS files are allowed in each site you visit. Your browsing becomes 10,000% more inefficient.
508.
by gasull 13y ago
No. It stills protects against known attacks, like XSS attacks. If you block scripts by default you'll have to configure what scripts to allow every time you visit a new site, or every time the site adds new assets.
509.
by gasull 13y ago
Firefox addons for privacy and security with usable settings: - AdBlock Edge. Filter subscriptions: EasyList, EasyPrivacy, Disable Malware, Fanboy's Annoyance List, Prebake - NoScript. Use "allow scripts globally" or otherw
510.
by gasull 13y ago
Agreed. I just used both terms interchangeably. English isn't my first language :)

More ›