g-b-r

22 ms·

541.
by g-b-r 1y ago
PRs only live on GitHub, what happens if it gets shut down or it accidentally loses some data?
542.
by g-b-r 1y ago
Merge commits allow you to nest series of commits, they're far from always bad
543.
by g-b-r 1y ago
> However, in more than a decade of software development, I don't think I've ever got much use out of commit messages. > normally the commit message has no relevant information Maybe that's why you've never got muc
544.
by g-b-r 1y ago
You only know poor developers then, I guess
545.
by g-b-r 1y ago
If security or bugs don't matter much for your project, sure
546.
by g-b-r 1y ago
There were some you consider particularly generous? After the Netanyahu-backed Hamas take over of Gaza, there was little hope for discussions, of course
547.
by g-b-r 1y ago
Yeah, or the minors held without even a charge. For sure it's preferable to exterminate a few thousand more Palestinian children. The second "offer" came after the first one was brushed off.
548.
by g-b-r 1y ago
Or this, a few days earlier: https://worldisraelnews.com/hamas-leader-in-gaza-yahya-sinwa... "We are ready to immediately conclude a prisoner exchange deal that involves releasing all our prisoners held in your prisons
549.
by g-b-r 1y ago
I'm sorry for your people, but most recognized genocides look very different from every other. And despite your history you don't seem very knowledgeable of what a genocide is, or willing to listen who actually studied the matter.
550.
by g-b-r 1y ago
The definition of genocide has never changed, but you probably never read it.
551.
by g-b-r 1y ago
> From POV of Israelies they gave Palestinians (2) and got a genocide in returns. The one Israeli prime minister who was about to give the Palestinians (2) was killed by an Israeli > Looking at Palestinians behavior they only want (1)
552.
by g-b-r 1y ago
> sends the signal that violence and atrocities should continue since they pay. What signal would it send if Israel came out better after killing 60 thousands people, almost 20 thousand children, razing to the ground most of a people&#x2
553.
by g-b-r 1y ago
and a lot of legacy baggage. We should begin collecting and centralizing the insights learned from the development of software outside the source code of specific projects
554.
by g-b-r 1y ago
I hoped it would most of all meant not using LLMs, but this is good as well At some point we might be able to be confident that the current version of all our dependecies has been carefully reviewed by enough reliable people, but right now
555.
by g-b-r 1y ago
> “It’s insanely broad,” Professor Goldsmith said. “This is an open-ended war authorization against an untold number of countries, organizations and persons that the president could deem within its scope.” > The draft appears to be mo
556.
Draft Bill Would Authorize Trump to Kill People He Deems Narco-Terrorists(nytimes.com)
18 points by g-b-r 1y ago|5 comments
557.
by g-b-r 1y ago
https://archive.is/TtiWh
558.
by g-b-r 1y ago
Astonishing https://journals.openedition.org/miranda/44430 is a good article
559.
by g-b-r 1y ago
I'm convinced that some bullys are taught to be so by their parents. “Son, when you begin school look for the kid who seems weakest, different, without friends; as soon as you know who he his, ridicule him, throw him to the ground, bea
560.
by g-b-r 1y ago
The first, most voted one, was flagged maybe because the linked news piece didn't say much
561.
by g-b-r 1y ago
(not by me, if that's why I've been downvoted)
562.
by g-b-r 1y ago
It's been flagged
563.
by g-b-r 1y ago
You're claiming that they're not really antifascists?
564.
by g-b-r 1y ago
Given they designated AntiFa a terrorist organization, they sure don't seem to like anti-fascists, though
565.
by g-b-r 1y ago
I wouldn't be completely surprised if there were a night of the long knives against democrats (if several high profile assassinations were to happen, for example), but to reach Nazism you'd need gas chambers
566.
by g-b-r 1y ago
And this specific proposal seems to let anyone know if your kid is: (A) Under five years of age. (B) At least 5 years of age and under 10 years of age. (C) At least 10 years of age and under 13 years of age. (D) At least 13 years of age and
567.
by g-b-r 1y ago
It's beyond obvious that it will, and it's why Google and Apple support it
568.
by g-b-r 1y ago
Of course all these measures risk making identifying minors trivial for any website and app, which is... not really ideal
569.
by g-b-r 1y ago
It would easily mean that you're required to have an unmodified device, running a locked down system, to be able to access any service that uses age verification. Although, a much more sensible alternative, would be to have parents (th
570.
by g-b-r 1y ago
The fact that it instead applies to 99.999% of the population is not exactly irrelevant

More ›