g-b-r

14 ms·

271.
by g-b-r 7mo ago
What would be deceptive, in the hypothesis of the other user, is the promotional campaign , not the movie itself
272.
Scientists Just Broke the Solar Power Limit Everyone Thought Was Absolute(scitechdaily.com)
42 points by g-b-r 7mo ago|17 comments
273.
by g-b-r 7mo ago
More information at https://www.eurekalert.org/news-releases/1120166 , paper at https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/jacs.5c20500
274.
by g-b-r 7mo ago
"to protect the free democratic basic order", the irony. It's incredible how even with the current surge of autocracy, most politicians can't see that the surveillance tools they crave for, could come under control of pe
275.
by g-b-r 7mo ago
So the response to a deceptive promotional campaign should be, just get a ticket and see if what's promoted is good?
276.
by g-b-r 7mo ago
Bloomberg and CNBC don't seem to have reported about this, maybe someone with contacts could make them aware?
277.
by g-b-r 8mo ago
You really need to look up the Kirchoff principle
278.
by g-b-r 8mo ago
No, this has nothing whatsoever to do with encryption, and no real security, probably
279.
by g-b-r 8mo ago
> The only way Claude can help improve your code cleanliness is if you write poor code? No? You assert that it writes better code than the average software developer? > Code coverage means nothing if you didn't carefully check ev
280.
by g-b-r 8mo ago
> The objective is that at some point, there will be enough docs and improved models that the need for human reviews decreases while quality of code reaches a steady state that is more consistent than any human team of varying skill leve
281.
by g-b-r 8mo ago
That sounds so reliable, I'm so confident it would get it right We're so screwed
282.
by g-b-r 8mo ago
> it can help you massively improve your code cleanliness. All of the little nice-to-have features, the cleanups, the high unit test coverage, nagging bug fixes, etc., they’re all trivial to do now. It can help if you write poor code wit
283.
by g-b-r 8mo ago
Stealing has been used for copyright infringement since forever, it is the correct word
284.
by g-b-r 8mo ago
A huge portion of the pro-AI crowd is motivated by irrational hype and delusion. LLMs are not a tool like an editor or an IDE, they make up code in an unpredictable way; I can't see how anyone who enjoyed software development could lik
285.
by g-b-r 8mo ago
I think votes would work much better, possibly split into several categories
286.
Generative AI Vegetarianism(sboots.ca)
4 points by g-b-r 8mo ago|0 comments
287.
by g-b-r 8mo ago
Yes, they sure made their own OS
288.
by g-b-r 8mo ago
Mac Mini connected to their "secure servers", so of course it's the opposite of the claimed local and private...
289.
by g-b-r 8mo ago
Reminds me of https://www.darkreading.com/application-security/supply-chai...
290.
by g-b-r 8mo ago
New account, smells like something illegal or a scam
291.
by g-b-r 8mo ago
Amazing, please make a blog post of it rotfl
292.
Many scientists now use AI but fail to disclose it, study finds(phys.org)
7 points by g-b-r 8mo ago|0 comments
293.
Data reveal a significant acceleration of global warming since 2015(phys.org)
4 points by g-b-r 8mo ago|0 comments
294.
by g-b-r 8mo ago
LLMs have a chance to make anything they've been trained on, by outputting it verbatim (or with small modifications). The question is the degree to which they can produce original things.
295.
by g-b-r 8mo ago
> It's just incredible how much impact he has had with this little hustle, given his products are basically turtles all the way down. What impact did he have?
296.
by g-b-r 8mo ago
It seems crazy that no one stressed it yet: for the last few years refusing the cookies has been requiring EXACTLY the same effort as accepting them, for the wide majority of websites!!! It's disheartening that so many people still do
297.
by g-b-r 8mo ago
Very few still have that, at least from Europe, and for those which do it's almost usually just a single additional step.
298.
by g-b-r 8mo ago
If you read carefully one of the groups is associated to apes. And it's said to have been " unable to program with agents " and be affected by " limitations in human neuroplasticity ". And there's an implied ju
299.
by g-b-r 8mo ago
Or says random stuff pretending it is the reason.
300.
by g-b-r 8mo ago
That "punchline" seems just a final argument in support of the thesis (that manual coding is becoming absurd, and only people as dumb as apes will insist on doing it).

More ›