If you read carefully one of the groups is associated to apes. And it's said to have been "unable to program with agents" and be affected by "limitations in hu

If you read carefully one of the groups is associated to apes. And it's said to have been "unable to program with agents" and be affected by "limitations in human neuroplasticity". And there's an implied judgment that AIs are going to become that good, and a suggestion that they already are good enough to take over coding, if you use them properly ("institutional inertia, affordability (...) were barriers to universal adoption of the new technology", "Effective use of the primitive AIs available at the time demanded a high level of expertise", "speculation on whether the nascent AIs of the period possessed true understanding", "Technical arguments for ape coding did not apply to newer generations of AI software engineers"). Was that (before the last sentence) what an LLM thought about my comment, by the way??